My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
05-26
>
3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2021 11:39:36 AM
Creation date
5/19/2021 8:31:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/26/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx A
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx B
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx D
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx E
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx F
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx G
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx H
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx I
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx J
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx K
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D2
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibits A1-A3
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibits E-G
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Use Element notes for certain uses where employee density and traffic generation are <br /> minimal, a higher FAR may be allowed beyond the 60-percent maximum provided the use <br /> meets the requirements in the Zoning Ordinance and other City requirements. FAR in the C-R <br /> (p) District is determined on a case-by-case basis, but generally stays within the ranges <br /> prescribed in the General Plan. As such, this site may have up to a 60-percent FAR for the <br /> proposed uses if sufficient amenities and mitigations are incorporated and if the employee <br /> density and traffic generation are minimal. See the Development Agreement, Environmental <br /> Assessment and Traffic and Circulation sections below for more information regarding staff's <br /> support for the increased FAR for the project. <br /> Below are some of the General Plan Goals, Programs, and Policies the project is consistent <br /> with or would promote: <br /> • Land Use Element <br /> Sustainability <br /> Program 2.2: Encourage the reuse of vacant and underutilized parcels and buildings within <br /> existing urban areas. <br /> Program 2.4: Require higher residential and commercial densities in the proximity of <br /> transportation corridors and hubs, where feasible. <br /> Program 2.5: Assure that new major commercial, office, and institutional centers are <br /> adequately served by transit and by pedestrian and bicycle facilities. <br /> Overall Community Development <br /> Goal 2: Achieve and maintain a complete well-rounded community of desirable <br /> neighborhoods, a strong employment base, and a variety of community facilities. <br /> Policy 4: Allow development consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map. <br /> Industrial, Commercial and Office <br /> Policy 13: Ensure that neighborhood, community, and regional commercial centers provide <br /> goods and services needed by residents and businesses of Pleasanton and its market <br /> area. <br /> Program 13.1: Zone sufficient land for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial <br /> uses to support Pleasanton's increasing business activity. <br /> Policy 15: Encourage industrial, commercial, and office development which is compatible <br /> with environmental constraints in Pleasanton. <br /> • Economic and Fiscal Element <br /> Goal 2: Sustain the community's quality of life with a vigorous and diverse economy. <br /> Policy 1: Enhance Pleasanton's diversified economic base through an aggressive business <br /> retention and expansion program. <br /> PUD-139 and P20-0973, 10x Genomics, Inc. Planning Commission <br /> 16 of 32 <br />he campus. All rooftop equipment would be <br /> screened by a decorative metal screen. A service and delivery area, as well as a fully enclosed <br /> trash/recycling area, both of which are integrated architecturally into the building design, would <br /> be located at the south/southwest corner of the building. See Figures 6 through 12 below for <br /> the proposed elevations, renderings, and site/building sections, all of which provide full design <br /> details. Additionally, see Exhibit B Plan Sheets A5.05 and A6.01 through A6.05 for a detailed <br /> breakdown of all colors/materials proposed for Building 1. A color/materials board was made <br /> available to the Commission for review prior to the public hearing. <br /> PUD-139 and P20-0973, 10x Genomics, Inc. Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 32 <br />e Traffic Study recommended a Class IV bicycle facility on the north side of the property. in the form of a two-way <br /> "cycle-track,"however,the applicant has indicated concerns about the feasibility of installing this facility due to the location <br /> of a utilities joint trench along a portion of this frontage,and thus proposed the shared path indicated on the plans. Although <br /> the Class IV facility is preferred by the City Traffic Engineer,the proposed facility could also be deemed an acceptable <br /> alternative. <br /> PUD-139 and P20-0973, 10x Genomics, Inc. Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 32 <br />