My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibits A1-A3
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
05-26
>
3_Exhibits A1-A3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2021 8:29:20 PM
Creation date
5/19/2021 8:28:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/26/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A 1 <br /> RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-06 <br /> A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE <br /> DECLARATION FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) REZONING AND <br /> DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE APPLICATION OF 10X GENOMICS AS FILED UNDER <br /> CASE NOS. PUD-139 and P20-0973 AND RELATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT <br /> WHEREAS, on November 6, 2020, 10x Genomics ("Applicant") submitted applications for: <br /> (1) a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezoning to rezone 1701 Springdale Avenue, Pleasanton <br /> from C-R (p) (Regional Commercial - peripheral sites) District to PUD-C-O (Planned Unit <br /> Development — Commercial-Office) District; (2) a PUD Development Plan to construct up to three <br /> new multi-story research and development, office and laboratory buildings totaling approximately <br /> 381,000 square feet, a parking structure, and related site improvements over multiple phases; as <br /> well as (3) make a finding of General Plan conformity for a related Development Agreement to <br /> vest the entitlements for the PUD Rezoning and Development Plan (collectively the "Project"); <br /> and <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton is the lead agency on the Project, and the City Council <br /> is the decision-making body for the proposed approval to carry out the Project; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Project is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act <br /> (CEQA), and an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared in <br /> accordance with Sections 15070 and 15072 of the CEQA Guidelines; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Initial Study concluded that the implementation of the Project would not <br /> result in any significant impacts to the environment; and <br /> WHEREAS, on April 2, 2021, Notice of Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Draft Initial Study <br /> (IS) and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) were sent to interested parties and <br /> property owners/residents in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) <br /> Guidelines Section 15072; and <br /> WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public meeting of May 26, 2021, the Planning Commission <br /> considered the written agenda report, all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and staff <br /> recommendations. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of <br /> Pleasanton, based on the entire record of proceedings, including the oral and written agenda <br /> reports and all public comment and testimony: <br /> Section 1: Recommends the City Council make the following findings for adoption of the <br /> Mitigated Negative Declaration: <br /> 1. It has independently reviewed and analyzed the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative <br /> Declaration and other information in the record and has considered the information <br /> contained therein, prior to acting upon or recommending approval of the Project; and <br />s for <br /> reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, <br /> NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane California_III_FIPS_0403_Ft_US current,or otherwise reliable. <br /> s`Latitude Geographies Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION <br />ssioner Allen asked if the company was planning on keeping all three locations in the <br /> City or if they would consolidate after the opening of the proposed campus. Mr. Jencek stated <br /> the idea was new net growth. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 November 18, 2020 <br />Approvals or that could prevent or <br /> 4412928_2 -10- <br /> the Project, which list shall include the following items: <br /> 4412928_2 -8- <br />