My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
05-26
>
3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2021 11:39:36 AM
Creation date
5/19/2021 8:31:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/26/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx A
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx B
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx D
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx E
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx F
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx G
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx H
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx I
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx J
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D1 - Appx K
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibit D2
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibits A1-A3
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
3_Exhibits E-G
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\05-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Figure 12: Proposed Site and Building Cross-sections <br /> i — <br /> r F �' <br /> A.pproxmate Property Line Location <br /> 1' ...t..rot A <br /> _ <br /> 0.� e A prc�*.irnate Property Line LoccfDn <br /> tw�� rr� .F. <br /> Osr�.tcrwwc ��••wetl Line La:aim <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> General Plan Conformance <br /> The subject site has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Retail/Highway/Service <br /> Commercial; Business and Professional Offices which permits office uses. R&D and laboratory <br /> uses are not separately defined or identified as a land use category in the PMC; however, both <br /> are listed among a broad range of potential uses in the PMC's definition of "Light Industrial." <br /> R&D and laboratory uses are not expressly permitted in the C-R (p) District; thus, the project <br /> would be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation if the subject site is rezoned <br /> to PUD, which is a more flexible zoning category, for which the types and parameters of <br /> allowable uses for this project would be specified (see PUD Rezoning and Uses section <br /> below). The proposed office uses would be permitted under the current and proposed zoning <br /> Districts. <br /> The General Plan indicates the average allowable development density/intensity, expressed as <br /> FAR, is 35-percent with a maximum FAR of 60-percent. Program 15.5 of the Land Use <br /> Element in the General Plan indicates, industrial, retail, and office projects should conform to <br /> the average density assumed (i.e., 35-percent FAR). However, projects may be allowed up to <br /> the maximum (i.e., 60-percent FAR) provided sufficient amenities and mitigations are <br /> incorporated into the project to justify the increased density. Additionally, page 24 of the Land <br /> PUD-139 and P20-0973, 10x Genomics, Inc. Planning Commission <br /> 15 of 32 <br />and uniquely designed structure featuring layered panel <br /> architecture which creates a rhythmic architectural pattern complemented by significant <br /> portions of glazing at the building entrances and on all four elevations. The building's massing <br /> incorporates significant wall plane movement, both horizontal and vertical architectural <br /> elements, changes to architectural element sizing and height (varies from 2-3 stories) and <br /> changes in material textures/colors throughout the various elevations. The third floor includes a <br /> recessed balcony oriented toward the middle of the campus. All rooftop equipment would be <br /> screened by a decorative metal screen. A service and delivery area, as well as a fully enclosed <br /> trash/recycling area, both of which are integrated architecturally into the building design, would <br /> be located at the south/southwest corner of the building. See Figures 6 through 12 below for <br /> the proposed elevations, renderings, and site/building sections, all of which provide full design <br /> details. Additionally, see Exhibit B Plan Sheets A5.05 and A6.01 through A6.05 for a detailed <br /> breakdown of all colors/materials proposed for Building 1. A color/materials board was made <br /> available to the Commission for review prior to the public hearing. <br /> PUD-139 and P20-0973, 10x Genomics, Inc. Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 32 <br />e Traffic Study recommended a Class IV bicycle facility on the north side of the property. in the form of a two-way <br /> "cycle-track,"however,the applicant has indicated concerns about the feasibility of installing this facility due to the location <br /> of a utilities joint trench along a portion of this frontage,and thus proposed the shared path indicated on the plans. Although <br /> the Class IV facility is preferred by the City Traffic Engineer,the proposed facility could also be deemed an acceptable <br /> alternative. <br /> PUD-139 and P20-0973, 10x Genomics, Inc. Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 32 <br />