16 ATTACHMENT 4 - Laserfiche WebLink

Employee Density and Traffic The proposed use will have no more than three employees on-shift at one time and will generate minimal traffic, compared to other uses that might occupy buildings of a similar size. The applicant provided a Trip Generation Traffic Analysis by a traffic engineering firm, Fehr and Peers which was reviewed and accepted by the City's Traffic Engineering Division (see Exhibit G). The Traffic Engineering Division concurs the project will have very low daily and peak trip generation and concludes the project is not expected to significantly impact the transportation system. Given the low density and minimal traffic impacts anticipated, staff suggests the proposed floor area ratio is acceptable. Consistency with Zoning District Regulations The proposal complies with the site development standards of the C-S District, as seen below in Table 1. Table 1: Site Development Conformance Table Site Development Standards CS-District Proposed Project Front Yard Setback 10' min. 11 53' to the three-story storage building from the nearest front property line' RI 385' to the one-story storage building from the nearest front property line' ll 20'to the office from the front property line along Stanley Blvd Second Frontage on 10' min. 0 22'-6"to the three-story storage building4 Nevada Street3 11 75' to the one-story storage buildings 0 815' to the offices Side Yard Setbacks N/A 11 33'to the east side and 230'to the west side for the three-story building ll 25'to the west side and 230'to the east side for the one-story building 11 9'to the east side and 40' to the west side for the office Floor Area Maximum 100% IZI 99.7%' ' —390' from Stanley Boulevard 2-589' from Stanley Boulevard 3 This lot is becoming a double frontage lot with the construction of Nevada Street. In the C-S zoning district the rear yard setback(10')and the front yard setback(10')are the same.As such,there are not changes to required setbacks. This assumes the easement width along the south side of the property will be reduced from 104' wide to a varying width of approximately 72'-98'feet wide as seen on Sheet Cl of Exhibit B.The building is setback 12' to the exiting easement,which complies with the 10' minimum. 5 This assumes the easement width along the south side of the property will be reduced.The building is setback 52'to the exiting easement,which complies with the 10' minimum. 6 This assumes the easement width along the south side of the property will be reduced.The building is setback 805' to the exiting easement,which complies with the 10' minimum. 'This assumes the easement width along the south side of the property will be reduced,which results in a lot area of 250,464- square-feet.The project will have a FAR of greater than 100%if the easement width is not reduced. As such, Exhibit A includes two conditions of approval(#14 and 42)addressing the necessary easement width reductions. P19-0128/P19-0129 Public Storage Planning Commission 7 of 15