My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16 ATTACHMENT 4
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
120120
>
16 ATTACHMENT 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2020 3:54:08 PM
Creation date
11/23/2020 3:54:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/1/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
16
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link Groups
Link
9:
16 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT B
Last modified:
11/24/2020 10:18:45 AM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
8:
16 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT D
Last modified:
11/23/2020 4:04:28 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
7:
16 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT C
Last modified:
11/23/2020 4:01:33 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
5:
16 ATTACHMENT 4
Last modified:
11/23/2020 3:54:08 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
4:
16 ATTACHMENT 3
Last modified:
11/23/2020 3:51:24 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
3:
16 ATTACHMENT 2
Last modified:
11/23/2020 3:48:56 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
2:
16 ATTACHMENT 1
Last modified:
11/23/2020 3:48:06 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
1:
16
Last modified:
12/9/2020 12:20:52 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Workshop <br /> The Planning Commission reviewed this application in a workshop on August 12, 2020. The <br /> minutes are attached as Exhibit E. The main discussion at hand involved the building mass <br /> and scale and the amenities and mitigations. <br /> • Building Massing and Scale: The Commission expressed a variety of comments <br /> including that the scale seemed appropriate (particularly given the heights within Irby <br /> Ranch), there didn't appear to be a loss of views, and as the property is not within the <br /> Downtown, it would not set a precedent for height Downtown. There was some concern <br /> regarding the treatment of the three-story building on the Nevada Street frontage and <br /> the use of orange on the third- floor of the elevation facing Stanley Boulevard, although <br /> ultimately the Commission did not recommend that changes be made to the design. <br /> • Amenities and Mitigations: There was generally support for the proposed amenities. <br /> Some Commissioners inquired about validation/formal support from the Bicycle, <br /> Pedestrian, and Trails Committee (BPTC) before moving forward with the trail amenity. <br /> However, after discussion about the Trails Master Plan prioritization process, funding <br /> potential of other trail locations in the City, and input from the City's Traffic Engineer and <br /> Landscape Architect Assistant, the Commission concurred that additional review by the <br /> BPTC would not be necessary, since the trail improvement had been well-vetted <br /> through the Trails Master Plan process with the BPTC and the public. Though, there <br /> was request for a condition of approval to provide flexibility for the trail funds to be <br /> allocated to other trail segments in the event of any changes. <br /> Project Modifications <br /> Since the Planning Commission workshop in August, the applicant has proposed some <br /> additional project modifications intended to further improve the design of the project's <br /> buildings, including the following notable changes: <br /> • On the three-story storage building, incorporated additional articulation of the third floor <br /> along the south elevation (Nevada Street) by increasing the upper-story step back from <br /> 10-feet to 28-feet, while retaining horizontal articulation for all three stories. <br /> • On the three-story storage building, removed the orange from the third story on north <br /> elevation (Stanley Boulevard). <br /> Exhibit C, pages 2 and 4, displays the changes to the articulation. The Exhibit also provides <br /> some renderings comparing the previous design and the proposed design. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Consistency with General Plan <br /> The project use is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of <br /> Retail/Highway/Service Commercial Business and Professional Offices. As described above, <br /> pursuant to the General Plan Land Use Element, this site may have up to a 100-percent FAR <br /> for the subject use if sufficient amenities and mitigations are incorporated and if the employee <br /> density and traffic generation are minimal. <br /> Amenities <br /> The proposed project is almost at the maximum FAR (i.e., approximately 99-percent) and <br /> proposes a variety of amenities and mitigations as follows: <br /> P19-0128/P19-0129 Public Storage Planning Commission <br /> 5 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.