My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
020420
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2020 5:28:08 PM
Creation date
1/28/2020 4:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
11 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\020420
11 ATTACHMENT 5A
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\020420
11 ATTACHMENTS 6-9
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\020420
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
After the initiative was defeated by 63 percent of the electorate in November 2016,the City <br /> resumed processing the Project. The City held public hearings on the Project in late 2017. <br /> c. Original 2017 Project Approval <br /> The City released a Recirculation Memorandum dated June 5, 2017, which found <br /> recirculation of the Final SEIR was not required prior to the City Council's consideration of the <br /> Project. The City Council approved the Project on November 7, 2017, which included <br /> certification of the Final SEIR, amendment of the City's General Plan, rezoning of the properties <br /> to allow an expanded set of uses, and adoption of development standards and design guidelines <br /> for the Project area. <br /> d. 2017 Project Lawsuit and 2018 Rescission of Project Approvals <br /> In December 2017, an unincorporated association of persons calling themselves <br /> Pleasanton Citizens for Responsible Growth("Petitioners") filed a lawsuit asking the court to <br /> rescind the City Council's Project approvals due to alleged CEQA violations. Petitioners alleged <br /> that the Final SEIR had an incomplete air quality analysis related to the Stoneridge Apartment <br /> Complex on Stoneridge Mall Road, and that more time was needed for public consideration of <br /> the economic impact analysis. In September 2018, the City Council voted to rescind the EDZ <br /> approvals in order to perform supplemental air quality analysis for the EDZ project. Petitioners <br /> thus dismissed the lawsuit. <br /> e. 2019 Partial Recirculated Draft SEIR, Revised Final SEIR, and Project <br /> Approval <br /> In July 2019,the City prepared and circulated the following supplemental environmental <br /> analyses for public comment: <br /> • Health Risk Assessment <br /> • Updated Air Quality Technical Memorandum <br /> • Greenhouse Gas Analysis <br /> • Energy Resources Technical Memorandum <br /> • A Supplemental Recirculation Memorandum summarizing the methodology and the <br /> findings of the above four documents was also circulated, dated July 9, 2019 <br /> Together, these five documents comprise the Partial Recirculated Draft Supplemental <br /> Environmental Impact Report for the Project(the "Partial Recirculated Draft SEIR"). <br /> The City received nearly 300 public comments during the period that the Partial <br /> Recirculated Draft SEIR was recirculated, though only 14 letters raised substantive comments on <br /> the adequacy of the Partial Recirculated Draft SEIR, and most simply expressed support for or <br /> opposition to the project. The City prepared responses to those comments in October and <br /> November 2019. Those responses,together with the Draft SEIR and the Final SEIR(including <br /> all previous responses to comments prepared prior to the original approval of the Project) <br /> comprise the Revised Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Project <br /> ("Revised Final SEIR"). <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.