Laserfiche WebLink
backed-up traffic potentially affecting operation of an upstream intersection), and <br /> acceptable freeway ramp operations. However, it is important to note most of these <br /> traffic impacts are characterized as significant and unavoidable only because some of <br /> the needed improvements require approval by Caltrans and thus are outside the <br /> immediate control of the City. As indicated in the December 11, 2019 supplemental <br /> memorandum to the Planning Commission from staff (Attachment 5), several of these <br /> improvements that would mitigate project traffic impacts to less than significant levels <br /> have already been designed and approved and are anticipated for construction and <br /> opening later this year. The graphics below (Figures 2 and 3) are intended to provide an <br /> overview of the required transportation mitigation improvements resulting from the <br /> implementation of the JDEDZ. For more detailed information, please refer to Chapter <br /> 4.D of the DSEIR (http://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/jdedz). <br /> Other Impacts <br /> The DSEIR concluded that other impacts from the JDEDZ on aesthetics, air quality, <br /> biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, <br /> hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, <br /> noise, population and housing, public services and utilities systems, transportation and <br /> traffic, and recreation would be mitigated (when appropriate) to less than significant <br /> levels. The mitigation measures are generally typical of measures applied to <br /> development in Pleasanton, such as dust control during construction; pre-construction <br /> surveys to avoid impacts on birds, bats or burrowing owls; protection of waterways and <br /> riparian vegetation; archaeological monitoring for archaeologically sensitive sites; Phase <br /> 1 environmental assessments required to assess and remediate any hazardous <br /> materials on sites; a limitation on the hours of construction; and vibration and acoustical <br /> studies to determine appropriate construction techniques and sound mitigation for new <br /> buildings. <br /> The DSEIR analyzed three alternatives (No Project, Reduced Retail, and Partial <br /> Buildout), which can be found in Chapter 5 of the DSEIR <br /> (http://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/jdedz). The DSEIR found none of the alternatives <br /> completely achieve the desired project objectives nor do any of these alternatives <br /> completely reduce all significant but unavoidable impacts. <br /> Page 12 of 23 <br />