My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
121522
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 4:10:07 PM
Creation date
12/9/2022 2:52:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
01 ATTACHMENT 1
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\121522
01 SUPPLEMENTAL
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\121522
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Traffic and Circulation Considerations <br /> The number of new vehicle trips that would be generated by the three conceptual <br /> development scenarios were estimated using trip generation rates from the City's travel <br /> demand model. These rates are based on data from the Institute of Transportation <br /> Engineer's Trip Generation Manual. This manual is a national compilation of trip <br /> generation statistics for land-uses of various sizes and types. The analysis focuses on <br /> the PM peak hour of travel as traffic within the area, as well as project trip generation, <br /> peaks during the evening peak period when retail, employment, and residential <br /> commute traffic is highest. <br /> As noted, Scenarios 2 and 2a reflect introduction of some commercial uses at the mall, <br /> and the model analyzed the addition of about 300,000 square feet of office uses to <br /> analyze how such use(s) might affect traffic conditions. <br /> Table 2: Trip Generation Summary <br /> PM Peak Hour Trip Generation <br /> Scenario <br /> In Out 'otal <br /> 1 474 291 765 <br /> 2 531 567 1,098 <br /> 2a 531 567 1,098 <br /> As illustrated in Table 2, Scenarios 2 and 2a would generate approximately 50 percent <br /> more traffic than Scenario 1. This is to be expected, as Scenarios 2 and 2a include <br /> additional office space not included in Scenario 1. <br /> Using the City's travel demand model, the directions of approach and departure for <br /> vehicle trips generated by the individual development scenarios were determined. This <br /> information was used to distribute new inbound and outbound trips to the local street <br /> network. It should be noted that the "existing" traffic volumes used for the analysis are <br /> from pre-pandemic conditions, which are higher than current volumes and also reflect <br /> traffic levels that occurred when the Nordstrom store was operational at the mall. <br /> Prevailing evening peak hour traffic volumes are highest on the sections of Stoneridge <br /> Mall Road between Genomics Place and Stoneridge Drive and on Canyon Way <br /> between Stoneridge Mall Road and Foothill Road. <br /> The section of Stoneridge Mall Road between Genomics Place and Stoneridge Drive is <br /> a segment which experiences high levels of congestion and queuing during the PM <br /> peak hour in the southbound direction. Vehicles often wait through multiple signal cycles <br /> to pass through the Stoneridge Mall Road/Stoneridge Drive intersection. This condition <br /> has prompted some vehicles to avoid this route to the freeway, instead of driving the <br /> longer distance to Springdale to access Stoneridge Drive. <br /> Scenario 1 contributes approximately 80 trips to this congested area. Scenarios 2 and <br /> 2a would generate additional impacts on this section compared to Scenario 1. The <br /> Page 11 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.