Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Project Description Initial Study/Addendum <br /> <br /> <br />22 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />City staff and environmental consultants. A key concern during the development of the Specific Plan was <br />the retention of the rural characteristics of the HVSP area. <br />A Draft EIR was prepared to analyze the impacts from adopting the Plan (SCH No. 97032034; <br />February 1998). The City held a public hearing on June 16, 1998, and adopted the HVSP Final EIR, the <br />HVSP, and related amendments to the City’s General Plan. The HVSP provided for the development <br />of a maximum of 183 new residences within the entire HVSP planning area, as well as the <br />construction of a “Bypass Road” linking Westbridge Lane with Sycamore Creek Way. As envisioned in <br />HVSP, the Bypass Road would provide access and utilities to 75 lots in the Spotorno Hill area (to date, <br />these lots have not been created), as well as to divert golf course and residential traffic from Happy <br />Valley Road, which is a County-owned and maintained two-lane collector road. The HVSP envisioned <br />that, once constructed, Westbridge Lane would be restricted for through traffic, with a barrier <br />located approximately at 2215 Westbridge Lane. <br />The HVSP designated the Bypass Road location and linked the construction of the Bypass Road in <br />two segments with development of the Spotorno parcels (and funding from the developers and <br />City):4 HVSP Lot 96 with a maximum of five new homes, HVSP Lot 97 with a maximum of 75 new <br />homes, and HVSP Lot 98 with a maximum of 22 new homes. In 2007, a 12-member Happy Valley <br />Blue Ribbon Committee, after 1-year of review and collaboration, recommended—and the City <br />Council accepted—a preferred alternative for a Bypass Road alignment to the City Council. <br />Water, sewer, and other utility systems were extended into portions of the HVSP planning area as <br />part of the golf course development to provide the golf course facility and golf course properties <br />with connections to the municipal system. The service area boundaries of other public services (e.g., <br />police and fire) were also extended into parts of the HVSP area. <br />Exhibit 5 depicts the current HVSP zoning/land use designations for the entire Spotorno Ranch <br />property. <br />• Planned Unit Development—Semi-Rural Density Residential (PUD-SRDR), on the Spotorno Flat <br />Area of Lot 98, which is the proposed project site. This designation allows for one dwelling <br />unit per 2 acres, or up to one dwelling unit per 1.5 acres, with a significant dedication of open <br />space. The latter is equivalent to 22 dwelling units. ADUs are also allowed per the HVSP. 5 <br />• he remainder of the potorno anch site is zoned/designated lannednit evelopment—griculture/pen pace ( -/). <br />Relevant City of Pleasanton Planning Initiatives <br />Measure FF <br />In November 1996, the voters of the City of Pleasanton approved Measure FF, requiring voter <br />approval for all but minor refinements to the City’s UGB. Areas outside the UGB line are generally <br />suitable for the long-term protection of natural resources, large lot agriculture and grazing, parks, <br /> <br />4 City of Pleasanton. 1998. Happy Valley Specific Plan. Page 51. <br />5 City of Pleasanton. 1998. Happy Valley Specific Plan. Page 30. Note: Subsequent to the adoption of the HVSP, State law has since <br />preempted approval of ADUs such that an ADU cannot be subject to a conditional use permit. As the project developer has <br />proposed that an ADU be built concurrently with each house, no further authorization is needed for such ADUs.