Laserfiche WebLink
as demonstrated by the "front-facing" and visible business operation, a point-of-sale <br /> mechanism, and business hours that are generally consistent with retail and restaurant uses. <br /> Additionally, several members of the Chamber expressed that a personal service use may <br /> create foot traffic equal to or greater than a retail or restaurant establishment and should be <br /> considered as an active use. A member of the Chamber also commented that signage for a <br /> non-active use that shares a tenant space with an active use should be secondary in size <br /> compared to the signage for an active use. Finally, members of both groups expressed that <br /> where an active use and a non-active use share a tenant space, that they both be required to <br /> obtain separate business licenses. Written correspondence with comments received as of the <br /> publication of this agenda report is included as Exhibit C. <br /> DRAFT REDLINE CHANGES <br /> Following the presentations to the Pleasanton Downtown Association and the Chamber of <br /> Commerce, staff composed draft changes to the DSP and PMC, which are summarized by <br /> topic below. Exhibit A to this agenda report shows the actual language of the proposed <br /> changes to the DSP and the PMC. <br /> Draft changes to definition of Active Ground Floor Use <br /> Staff proposes amendments to the definition of "Active Ground Floor Use" to better articulate it <br /> intent. Additional language has been added to indicate that active uses are those that attract <br /> walk-in customers. And, language proposed in the DSP would indicate that uses that are <br /> subject to the AGFUO are required to follow the procedures for zoning certificate approval <br /> outlined in the PMC. <br /> Although some members of the Chamber of Commerce suggested personal services be <br /> treated as an active use, staff does not support making this change, since it was a deliberate <br /> and explicit policy decision to exclude such businesses from the definition at the time the DSP <br /> was adopted. Staff notes that this exclusion is reflected in the PMC's definition, but not in the <br /> DSP, and so proposes to add this to the DSP for consistency. <br /> The draft changes to the definition of active ground-floor use are shown in PMC Section <br /> 18.08.017; the procedures for zoning certificate approval are identified in a new section, PMC <br /> Section 18.81.040, which is also discussed further below. <br /> LD-P.18, Active Ground Floor Use Requirements for Multi-Use Spaces <br /> The draft changes proposed to Policy LD-P.18 consist of the following: <br /> • Increase in the depth required for active uses in multi-use spaces such that at least 60 <br /> percent (instead of the current 25 percent) of the depth of the tenant space is dedicated <br /> to an active use.2 The depth is measured perpendicular to Main Street, which remains <br /> consistent with the existing policy language. <br /> • Add a requirement that at least 60 percent of the total square footage of the tenant <br /> space be dedicated to the active use. <br /> 2 Staff's recommendation is for 60% of the depth and 60% of the square footage, although a variety of other <br /> options also exist, such as 50% or 75%. <br /> Active Ground Floor Use Overlay Planning Commission <br /> 3 of 5 <br /> for a <br /> vacant tenant space at 560 Main Street. Due to the non-active nature of the use, the Zoning Administrator denied <br /> the Zoning Certificate that would allow the use to occupy the tenant space on June 7, 2021. <br /> Active Ground Floor Use Overlay Planning Commission <br /> 2 of 5 <br />