3 - Laserfiche WebLink

on Lots 1-4 and for remodeling and expansion of the existing home on Lot 5 (or demolition of the existing home and construction of a new home on Lot 5). Please refer to Figure 6 for the proposed site layout, and Table 1 for the existing and proposed lot sizes. Figure 6: Proposed Layout —• ____ axcau{�c�tlbN,er - • it __... Lott Lo1 3 t ,.ter. t • Lot5 • • i Lot 1 • exiShnt,tesi Cnrx . • rnh Table 1: Existing and Proposed Specific Plan Land Use Designations and Lot Sizes Existing Proposed Lot No. Land Use Minimum Lot Size Lot No. Land Proposed Lot Lot Size Use Size Lot 1 PUD-A 34,539 sq. ft. NSSP Lot 5 64,141 sq. ft. Lot 24 PUD-A 1 Acre 3.28 Acres Lot 2 PUD- 14,898 sq. ft. Lot 3 MDR 14,866 sq. ft. Lot 4 14,617 sq. ft. Trail Realignment: The multi-use trail shown in the NSSP follows the alignment of Sycamore Creek through the project site. The applicant proposes to realign this planned trail location on the project site from its current terminus at the Bridle Creek development to head south along Dale Way, and then turn east along the property frontage on Sycamore Road to be connected to the Alisal Trail which may be constructed by another development. To implement the PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission 990 Sycamore Road 11 of 23 land use designation to be less than one acre in area; 2. Rezone an approximately 1.01-acre portion of the site from Planned Unit Development— Agricultural (PUD-A) District to Planned Unit Development — Medium Density Residential (PUD-MDR) District; 3. PUD development plan approval for a 5-lot single-family residential development with related on- and off-site improvements; and 4. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map approval to subdivide the 3.28-acre parcel into five residential lots for four new homes and one existing home. Site Layout: As proposed, Lot 1 would have frontage onto Sycamore Road and would share the existing driveway to the existing home on Lot 5 for access. Lots 2-4 would front on and be accessed from Sycamore Creek Way. The applicant proposes to retain the existing home and outbuildings on Lot 5. The new homes would be custom homes constructed by individual homeowners after the lots are sold. Design guidelines detailing the development standards and design criteria are proposed for construction of the future homes and related development PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission 990 Sycamore Road 10 of 23 hat the Medium Density Residential (MDR) designation in fact makes more sense, with a clear Condition of Approval prohibiting further subdivision. There is no practical difference in designating the lots LDR versus MDR; the requested number of lots, lot dimensions, and so on are not affected either way. PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission 990 Sycamore Road 9 of 23 than the number of residential lots/homes permitted by the PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission 990 Sycamore Road 7 of 23 A'17 3. `.r� C� . P / 34. a a 9 ,e // l'`* ,7^" �, 3 a �r -) NILW� 1� Ply (7) ,3 •" r �� t ', " r 4,, ./;:'!7*. .'/ i 5 tui' "Pi,,, ryp ( ot, S'L,, i .g,, 1i, I .+� s1. i� 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36. ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k 3S 94 '@ g 'via R T3 1:5,300 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _ January 7 2020 `( �� ""�� 0 330 660 Feet I Y I , I I