|
proposed trail realignment, a 25-foot wide trail easement would be created parallel to
<br /> Sycamore Road on Lot 1. This extra width is needed to accommodate any necessary
<br /> meandering of the trail to avoid obstacles (e.g., in one section, it needs to meander around an
<br /> existing oak). Figure 7 illustrates the proposed realignment. Since the trail would need to
<br /> cross the driveway serving the site but located on adjacent private property, striping or some
<br /> other form of delineation would indicate the pedestrian path of travel.
<br /> Fi•ure 7: Pro•osed Trail Reali•nment
<br /> 4`-' 1 ".: Iv )1,ic ilier.... , . . ,. ..kilm: 1 tri. - , i , - , V; ,,
<br /> t `
<br /> Existing Trail at ," ,, 7., =. - -.
<br /> • Bridle Creek Development - , , - • _ _ _.
<br /> It"' , -__ ., S • fill ' . - . - •
<br /> r
<br /> Vie ' cm ,°. .eY ' '. , .`.e, g
<br /> '1911e4ki
<br /> •
<br /> ( .�, •• 4 * NSSP Trail Alignment '.......,*^'
<br /> rIProposed Trail ' x"
<br /> Alignment
<br /> •qtr tit 4. .
<br /> e
<br /> Nat
<br /> VI.
<br /> 4 u4 , ', a a _*OF.. ,•... . ..--- .-""*- •--"_
<br /> 41111.4. AI.
<br /> •
<br /> V
<br /> iiii _-_-_-..
<br /> Proposed Striping Across L. •'*--
<br /> •-t the Driveway
<br /> '''1,-.),49r
<br /> tet sr Proposed Alisal Trail by --
<br /> Another Development Mr
<br /> L Fw.t r mw
<br /> ;, I
<br /> � �
<br /> ANALYSIS
<br /> The analysis below is provided based on the proposed 5-lot residential development. As noted
<br /> in the Executive Summary section, staff does not support the NSSP amendment to increase
<br /> density, or the related re-zoning, PUD Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Map for this
<br /> project.
<br /> Land Use and Density
<br /> The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of"Low Density Residential" on the
<br /> General Plan Map. However, the General Plan Land Use Element indicates that General Plan
<br /> Land Uses, densities and street alignments that are within specific plan areas are only
<br /> conceptually shown on the General Plan Map while the Specific Plan provides additional detail.
<br /> Therefore, the proposed development will need to conform to the Land Use Designation and
<br /> density indicated by the NSSP.
<br /> The NSSP Land Use Designation for the site is PUD-Agriculture, which allows a maximum
<br /> density of 1.0 dwelling unit per acre. The proposal would change the land use designation of
<br /> an approximately 1.01-acre northern portion of the site from PUD-Agriculture to PUD-Medium
<br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission
<br /> 990 Sycamore Road
<br /> 12 of 23
<br />Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission
<br /> 990 Sycamore Road
<br /> 10 of 23
<br />hat the Medium Density
<br /> Residential (MDR) designation in fact makes more sense, with a clear Condition of Approval
<br /> prohibiting further subdivision. There is no practical difference in designating the lots LDR
<br /> versus MDR; the requested number of lots, lot dimensions, and so on are not affected either
<br /> way.
<br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission
<br /> 990 Sycamore Road
<br /> 9 of 23
<br /> than the number of residential lots/homes permitted by the
<br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission
<br /> 990 Sycamore Road
<br /> 7 of 23
<br /> A'17 3. `.r� C� .
<br /> P / 34. a a 9 ,e // l'`* ,7^" �, 3 a �r -)
<br /> NILW� 1� Ply (7) ,3 •" r �� t ', "
<br /> r
<br /> 4,, ./;:'!7*.
<br /> .'/ i 5 tui' "Pi,,, ryp ( ot, S'L,, i .g,, 1i, I .+� s1.
<br /> i� 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36.
<br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k
<br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via
<br /> R T3
<br /> 1:5,300
<br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _
<br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""���
<br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y
<br /> I , I I
<br />
|