Laserfiche WebLink
Fi•ure 7: Pro•osed Streetsca•e Renderin• from Johnson Court <br /> =w .rte, aw <br /> r <br /> TT <br /> 4weisa <br /> 8 5 <br /> P. <br /> Y <br /> 4. <br /> 4te <br /> ! <br /> " IN <br /> , 1 ly ske 1 .3A.1a + <br /> 411111 <br /> Figure 8: Proposed Streetscape Renderings <br /> :Iiiiiiimmismin..._ <br /> tom _ <br /> VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST <br /> nir <br /> 4 <br /> VIEW LOOKING NORTHWEST VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST <br /> Tree Removal <br /> An arborist report surveyed all trees measuring six-inches and greater in diameter, within and <br /> adjacent to the subject parcel. A total of 11 trees, comprising two species (four Italian Cypress <br /> and seven Callery pear), were surveyed on-site. One other tree (Callery pear, #112) was in <br /> proximity to the site. One of the Callery pear trees surveyed on-site is considered <br /> Heritage-sized (as defined by the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC)). The attached arborist <br /> report (Exhibit E) recommends removing all on-site trees, but preservation of the off-site <br /> Callery pear (Tree #112). <br /> P16-1349 and PUD-121, 6455 Owens Drive Planning Commission <br /> 9 of 15 <br />a CI 3 3 LE] a E3 $ al 0 3 m m 3 <br /> [ I BUILDING NORTH ELEVATION <br /> o <br /> ® 7077lR�, * m 0 m <br /> Itc.1,1° 0 3 0 �..,0 <br /> 41C90 <br /> 0 LA alt I. ra <br /> MOIMMA 11101*0 ® i ® ^ I , <br /> BI p S 3 CI <br /> al -Ei <br /> al 3 <br /> -s:895e°1 I I-1:1 <br /> m m 3 0 1 '• 0 m m a m 0€] 0 m 0 -fl m 3 <br /> n BUILDING SOUTH ELEVATION <br /> SCALE,4•,. <br /> � .- -- o a_ ARCHITECT <br /> ""© 5 m ; SCOTTOBSW AACH1ECT.NC <br /> 0 <br /> 3 m 0 - - <br /> m 3 <br /> "1" ° m --e 0 al r°" OWENS COURT <br /> 'fl 0 3 0 6455 OWENS DRIVE <br /> 1-3-1 BUILDING WEST ELEVATION R1 1 BUILDING EAST ELEVATION PLEASANTON,CA.94588 <br /> SHEET NOTES EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS <br /> -REFER TO SHEET Al FOR MATERIAL AND FINISHES A3 <br /> -ALL EXTERIOR SIGNAGE WILL BE SHOWN UNDER SEPARATE SLBMITTAI <br /> P16-1349 and PUD-121, 6455 Owens Drive Planning Commission <br /> 8 of 15 <br />tes (Exhibit D). <br /> Planning Commission Work Session Comments <br /> • Drive-through was not supported given queueing concerns and spillback onto Johnson <br /> Court and Owens Drive, as well as potential on-site vehicular conflicts at drive-through <br /> exit and the drive aisle between the buildings. <br /> • Commission was split on new commercial buildings' orientation along Owens Drive — <br /> i.e. whether all parking should be at the rear and building required to front Owens Drive, <br /> versus new commercial buildings pushed back with parking in front. <br /> • Building design, materials and colors were acceptable. <br /> • Tree removal and tree replacement plan were acceptable. <br /> • The proposed uses were generally supported with a preference to include more uses <br /> allowed by C-F District. <br /> P16-1349 and PUD-121, 6455 Owens Drive Planning Commission <br /> 2 of 15 <br />