My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
09-25
>
3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2019 12:32:34 PM
Creation date
9/18/2019 11:25:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2019
Document Relationships
3_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\09-25
3_Exhibits A & C-F
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\09-25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Building Architecture <br /> The new commercial building is designed with more traditional architectural elements. Massing <br /> has been segmented by varying wall plane depths, varying roof heights and parapet <br /> treatments, recessed storefronts and entrances, material and color changes, horizontal belly <br /> bands and wainscoting, canvas awnings, wood arbors, and various other ornamental <br /> treatments comprised of both stucco and metal. Finish materials include stucco, brick, stacked <br /> stone and typical storefront glazing. Primary exterior colors are generally earthtone in nature <br /> including brown and tan, but also include gray and yellow accent colors. Figures 6, 7 and 8 <br /> show the proposed building elevations and streetscape renderings. <br /> Trash Enclosure <br /> The proposed roofed trash enclosure would be a freestanding structure located at the <br /> northwest corner of the subject parcel. The exterior materials and colors of the enclosure <br /> would match those of the new commercial building. <br /> Figure 6: Proposed Building Elevations <br /> icrze, ...:.. <br /> m0 <br /> Ca r <br /> ulUSItW m <br /> _ m <br /> s Ism • I I <br /> ., isZPVIRP" <br /> � 3 m LEa CI 3 3 LE] a E3 $ al 0 3 m m 3 <br /> [ I BUILDING NORTH ELEVATION <br /> o <br /> ® 7077lR�, * m 0 m <br /> Itc.1,1° 0 3 0 �..,0 <br /> 41C90 <br /> 0 LA alt I. ra <br /> MOIMMA 11101*0 ® i ® ^ I , <br /> BI p S 3 CI <br /> al -Ei <br /> al 3 <br /> -s:895e°1 I I-1:1 <br /> m m 3 0 1 '• 0 m m a m 0€] 0 m 0 -fl m 3 <br /> n BUILDING SOUTH ELEVATION <br /> SCALE,4•,. <br /> � .- -- o a_ ARCHITECT <br /> ""© 5 m ; SCOTTOBSW AACH1ECT.NC <br /> 0 <br /> 3 m 0 - - <br /> m 3 <br /> "1" ° m --e 0 al r°" OWENS COURT <br /> 'fl 0 3 0 6455 OWENS DRIVE <br /> 1-3-1 BUILDING WEST ELEVATION R1 1 BUILDING EAST ELEVATION PLEASANTON,CA.94588 <br /> SHEET NOTES EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS <br /> -REFER TO SHEET Al FOR MATERIAL AND FINISHES A3 <br /> -ALL EXTERIOR SIGNAGE WILL BE SHOWN UNDER SEPARATE SLBMITTAI <br /> P16-1349 and PUD-121, 6455 Owens Drive Planning Commission <br /> 8 of 15 <br />tes (Exhibit D). <br /> Planning Commission Work Session Comments <br /> • Drive-through was not supported given queueing concerns and spillback onto Johnson <br /> Court and Owens Drive, as well as potential on-site vehicular conflicts at drive-through <br /> exit and the drive aisle between the buildings. <br /> • Commission was split on new commercial buildings' orientation along Owens Drive — <br /> i.e. whether all parking should be at the rear and building required to front Owens Drive, <br /> versus new commercial buildings pushed back with parking in front. <br /> • Building design, materials and colors were acceptable. <br /> • Tree removal and tree replacement plan were acceptable. <br /> • The proposed uses were generally supported with a preference to include more uses <br /> allowed by C-F District. <br /> P16-1349 and PUD-121, 6455 Owens Drive Planning Commission <br /> 2 of 15 <br />