Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 1: 189 W. Angela (corner of W. Angela St. and Peters Ave.) <br /> '� <br /> 1, ;il <br /> f j ,., .`, q t <br /> - • 1 <br /> itt <br /> r <br /> "41119'V''' i. ` 6. . 44k 4 i ,; . <br /> -1,1"4" * 4t` ''',.....„..... ..4 4' - 4 <br /> ill <br /> ze.40, - .:,1,.;-, .,:. , "° ,...t:i. :,,, /1 , ,,,,,,,),,,y . 4,:, <br /> . - '' , I ilk.: <br /> ' 4II ,IF'll <br /> lip <br /> ,, • i4/ <br /> /* '-,;''''. ' ''°'4,'LL .,,ei ,J <br /> ." <br /> Table 2: Approximate Property Dimensions <br /> Address Approximate Dimensions <br /> 273 Spring Street 71-feet by 200-feet <br /> 536 & 550 St. John Street 184-feet by 168-feet <br /> 377 St. Mary Street 61-feet by 175-feet <br /> 374 St. Mary Street 62.5-feet by 112-feet <br /> 446-458 Peters Avenue / 225 W. Angela Avenue 1 173-feet by 58-feet <br /> Outdoor Dining in Mixed Use-Transitional <br /> As currently recommended by the Task Force, outdoor dining applications (i.e., applications to <br /> allow tables, chairs, umbrellas, and other furniture associated with dining outdoors) in the <br /> Mixed Use-Transitional district would require review and approval by the Planning Commission. <br /> Outdoor dining applications in other districts requires review by the Zoning Administrator instead <br /> of the Planning Commission, and the Zoning Administrator's action is subject to a 15-day appeal <br /> period. As such, staff recommends outdoor dining in the Mixed Use-Transitional district be <br /> subject to the same level of review as other zoning districts, and not be subject to review by <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> Amendments to Land Use Designations <br /> During its review of the DSP, the Task Force considered various map revisions to reconcile <br /> discrepancies between the General Plan Land Use Diagram, Downtown Specific Plan Land Use <br /> Downtown Specific Plan Planning Commission <br /> 9 of 15 <br /> a drive aisle (25-feet). <br /> Figure 1 shows an example of a corner lot located at 189 W. Angela Street (at the northeast <br /> corner of Peters Avenue and Angela Street), which has an approximate dimension of 50-feet, as <br /> measured perpendicular to Peters Avenue. This may not be able to accommodate viable <br /> commercial space, since it leaves approximately 25-feet for the commercial space once a <br /> 25-foot wide drive aisle is taken into consideration. Approximate lot dimensions of select other <br /> properties are identified in Table 2. <br /> Downtown Specific Plan Planning Commission <br /> 8 of 15 <br />luded in the table of recommended revisions to the <br /> November 2018 draft Specific Plan with Item 31 in Exhibit E, attached. Specifically, the policy <br /> direction notes that if ground-floor residential is located behind commercial properties (in the <br /> Downtown Commercial District where ground-floor may be considered and in the <br /> Mixed Use-Transitional District), it must be designed to minimize visibility from the commercial <br /> street frontage. While the phrase, "minimizing visibility" is subjective and will be determined by <br /> the hearing body, there are tools that can be used to aid in an accurate review by the hearing <br /> body. As such, staff recommends strengthening the specific plan relating to visibility as follows: <br /> • Add an implementation measure to formalize story pole requirements to ensure accurate <br /> story poles are installed. <br /> Downtown Specific Plan Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 15 <br /> of 15 <br />