14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Laserfiche WebLink

Public Feedback on Development Impact Fee Study (May 1 through September 12. 2018) Page 3 12.The fees shouldn't include the 3% administrative fee. a. Staff response — Agreed. The administrative fee is not included. 13.Concern with the $1.5M per acre acquisition cost for parks. a. Staff response —While the actual cost will be determined when the City seeks to purchase the land, for the study, we lowered acquisition cost estimate to $1M per acre. 14.How does the City control for buildings that are R&D or Office but seek permit for industrial use to reduce impact fees? a. Staff response — City staff review and approve project descriptions and drawings. If the applicant constructed a different building, City staff know and take appropriate action. 15.Office generates more peak hour trips than industrial — greater than is reflected in the rate chart. a. Staff response - The pm peak hour trip rate for office is 1.42 trips per 1000 square feet. The pm peak hour trip rate for industrial is 0.86 trips per 1000 square feet. Industrial generates approximately 60% relative to office. The maximum fee for office is $14.60 per square foot and industrial is $8.84 per square foot which is 60% of the office maximum. 16.Sunol @ 1-680, 2nd Bridge at Bernal and Foothill widening shouldn't be allocated to development. a. Staff response — Projects are allocated to new development based on future need. Both the Bernal Bridge and the Foothill widening are necessary to handle future traffic volumes (including volumes from new development). Sunol has become deficient and the City is in the process of designing and constructing the project. This project was included in the 2010 transportation fee update and was not deficient in 2010. For this reason, the Sunol Interchange project is grandfathered in as a fully funded developer fee project. 17.Can you calculate the fees excluding Civic Center? a. Staff response —The table below identifies the fees excluding Civic Center project. However, excluding the Civic Center project would not be comprehensively addressing future needs.