01 - Laserfiche WebLink

one person per accident, $30,000 for injury of two or more persons per accident, and $5,000 for property damage). As staff are not aware of any litigation involving taxis operating in Pleasanton where insurance limits have been at issue, a change is proposed to require $100,000 for injuries to one person, $300,000 for injuries for 2 or more persons, and $50,000 for property per accident. $6.40.140 Time for processing taxi driver permit. Staff often need additional time to review background materials and get results from drug testing for taxi driver applications. The proposed modification provides for sixty days for application review. The existing code has no set review period, making some applicants expect an immediate decision. §9.24.040 & 413.08.190 Correct clerical error involving Ordinances 2125 and 2136. By Council action (Ordinance 2125) in August 2015, smoking was prohibited in parks and trails. Subsequently, by Council action (Ordinance 2136) in December 2015, smoking was also prohibited at Downtown special events. Due to clerical error, Ordinance 2136 did not incorporate the changes adopted by Ordinance 2125, so a correction is needed to properly reflect the changes adopted by both Ordinances 2125 and 2136. §11.08.020 City traffic engineer. Update reference to position of City Traffic Engineer to accurately reflect the current staff position. 611.36.020 Curb markings. Amendment to clarify that parking limits at white and yellow curbs can be time and date restricted per specific adjacent signage. 611.36.100 No parking zones. Amendment to Subsection H. to clarify that the traffic engineer can make adjustments to the "No Parking" zone near fire hydrants. 613.04.050 Prohibit private painting on public curbs. To prevent driver confusion and address public safety concerns, the description of prohibited encroachments (activities in the public right of way) is proposed to include prohibiting private painting on public curbs. This amendment addresses situations noted by the Police Department and Traffic Division about confusing permanent painted private markings and writings being made on public street curbs. Chapter 17.16 Clarification of Tree Preservation procedures. Amendments to clarify that when a proposed heritage tree removal is: (a) unrelated to new development, then appeals are heard by the Heritage Tree Board of Appeals; and (b) related to new development, then appeals per Chapter 18.144 (Appeals). Other clarifying amendments regarding certified consulting arborist, noticing distance for board of appeals hearings, mitigation options when trees are removed for new development, penalties when trees impermissibly removed during construction, and pruning guidelines. 618.124.070, 418.124.240, and §18.124.270 Correct internal references and a clerical error. Correct references to "objectives of zoning ordinance" when considering conditional use permit applications rather than only referencing Chapter 18.124 Page 3 of 4