Laserfiche WebLink
homes is a small element of design. The Planning Commission did not forbid white trim, <br />but discouraged it. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver supported Ms. Michelotti's request for pictures of homes that do or <br />do not meet the guidelines. Requests were made to include pictures of houses in Moller <br />Ranch and the Nelson house. Ms. Michelotti wanted a picture of the house in Moller <br />Ranch that meets the guidelines that is on the first tier from the entrance and has green <br />shutters on it. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cannon said value guides would be given to Councilmembers so they could <br />look at the area as they are out driving around. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver declared the public hearing open and reiterated that no decision <br />would be made at this meeting. <br /> <br /> Neil Nelson, 8088 Bethel Lane, expressed concern about the implications of the <br />West Foothill Road Corridor Overlay District requirements. At the last Planning <br />Commission he artended, a Commissioner asked if a color were not allowed on Foothill <br />Road why would it be allowed on Vineyard Avenue. Mr. Nelson said his lot was a pre- <br />existing lot of record and was exempt from the Ove~ay District, yet the Council found he <br />had to meet the new Code requirements. He referred to the area south of the Golden <br />Eagle Estates entrance and stated there is an original adobe farmhouse with a roof pitch <br />of 6.75-12. Under the new ordinance, that house could not be built. Yet that is part of <br />Pleasanton's history. It is stucco, has white trim and exceeds the 6.5 roof pitch elements <br />in the new Code, which is supposed to maintain the rural, aesthetic values of the area. <br />That is unacceptable to him. The City would become so restrictive in its zoning <br />ordinances that it takes away property owners' personal right to choose architectural <br />styles. He referred to a document he got on the Intemet from the Governor's Office of <br />Planning and Research and is entitled "The Planning Commissioner's Book - Part 2." <br />He quoted from the book regarding the police power of local government which should <br />be exercised in a reasonable manner to protect public health, safety and welfare and not <br />preempted by federal or state law. It also stated Constitutional guarantees of equal <br />protection, free speech, due process and just compensation for the taking of private <br />property, all of which define the boundaries of the police power. An illegal taking may <br />occur as a result of either public acquisition of private property without just <br />compensation or of excessively restrictive land use regulations that deprive a property <br />owner of all uses of his land. Mr. Nelson said there are other ridgelines in Pleasanton <br />such as Ruby Hill. There are other property owners that are not being restricted. He felt <br />there were many property owners that had plans to build a French country or English <br />Tudor style and Council was banning the traditional architectural style of the California <br />mission. He said there are only 100 homes left to be built and to deny the property <br />owners personal preferences in architectural styles and colors is not conducive to building <br />a community rich in character. It does not reflect the diverse variety of personal styles <br />and backgrounds. He urged Council to stop the restrictive regulations. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 20 04/04/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />