CCMIN050289 - Laserfiche WebLink

209 Mr. Chris Haynam, 3035 Ferndale Court, member of the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan citizens committee, recommended approval of the project. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to the application or the negative declaration. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that on the basis of a review of an initial environmental study done for this project and a finding that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and a further finding that a negative declaration is appropriate in connection with PUD-89-1, the application of Far West Associates to construct a 124-unit residential project and related improvements to be located on an approximately 20 acre site located easterly of the terminus of Stoneridge Drive, that Resolution No. 89-201 be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmembers Brandes and Tarver It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, after finding that the development plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the purposes of the PUD District, that Ordinance No. 1416 be introduced, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving PUD-89-1, the application of Far West Associates for development plan approval to construct a 124-unit residential project and related improvements to be located on an approximately 20 acre site located easterly of the terminus of Stoneridge Drive, subject to conditions set forth in Staff Report 89:182, but modifying the site plan to relocate a one-story unit next to three one-story units across from the arroyo mocho and relocating a two-story unit to replace the one-story unit, changing Condition No. 8 to state the public service easement begins at the property line and goes through the property as necessary, that Condition No. 21 be corrected to read 23 feet, and Condition No. 12 be modified to conform to the final Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmembers Brandes and Tarver item 6b City Review of Plans for the Reqradinq of Building Pad Areas for Tract 5835, Vintage Heights II, Lots 14, 15, 16, and 57, located at 2980, 2985, 2977 Amorso Court and 953 Finovino, respectively. Zoning for the property is R-1-6500 (Single-family Residential) - 6 - 5-2-89