CCMIN050289 - Laserfiche WebLink

211 No. 5 to state that "a single-story unit shall be relocated next to the three single-story units along the arroyo mocho and one two-story unit shall be relocated from the arroyo mocho area to the location of the relocated single-story unit". Mr. Balducci stated that with regard to Condition No. 8, dedication of the public service easement, he wants it clear that the easement begins at the property line and goes through the property as necessry. With regard to Condition No. 12, Mr. Balducci requested that the following be deleted "the final street pattern as is developed by adjoining parcels", and insert "shall be modified by the development as necessary to conform to the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan". Mr. Balducci also noted a typographical error in Condition No. 21, which should be 23 feet length, not 123 feet. Mr. Balducci stated this project is the result of compromise on many issues, and is now an attractive development. He requested Council approval of the project. Mr. Swift stated that with respect to Condition No. 8, that is what was expected in this condition. He stated that Condition No. 21 should read 23 feet, not 123 feet. He stated the intent of Condition No. 12 is to keep the street pattern if this property develops first, but to recognize that if the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan creates new connections to Stoneridge on the Chu or Dawes property as to the northern end rather than where they are shown on this property, that these connections as they are on the eastern end of the property are interim street connections and would then be closed. The connections from the Balducci property to the north and south into the Chu and Dawes property is the local street connections and are designed and can be used to carry into those properties with no problem. The difficulty is the street connection to Stoneridge Drive. What staff it saying is that will be an interim connection if the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan makes the intersection at a different location than where these streets are shown. Mr. Swift recommended that Condition No. 12 not be changed. Mrs. Margo Bruin, 4050 Suffolk Way, stated she supports this project with the suggested changes. Mr. Ed Bruin, 4050 Suffolk Way, stated he supports this plan with the modifications and feels it will be a great asset to the north end of the City. Mr. Nick Cassens, 4082 Suffolk Way, stated that with the minor modification of changing the location of the single-story unit to the arroyo mocho area he can support the project as presented. - 5 - 5-2-89