Laserfiche WebLink
235 <br /> <br /> Mr. Cook replied that the 20-foot access was created with the <br /> idea of providing a temporary public access way to Parcel 2. He <br /> added that Parcel 2 was intended to develop from the Stoneridge <br /> Drive orientation with no plans to have any formal entry from <br /> Trenery Drive. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr commented that keeping options available could be <br /> helpful since things may change from year to year. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes inquired if staff concurred with removing the <br /> water easement condition. <br /> <br />~ Mr. Swift replied that the purpose of the easement is to <br /> provide irrigation water to the walnut trees, and if Parcel 2 is <br />~3 separated form Parcel 1, there would be no way to irrigate the <br />< trees without using the well. He added that Mr. Cooper was right <br />Z in saying that in the long term, when Parcel 2 is developed, water <br /> will be brought in through a public water system that would serve <br />~ the back lot. The easement would then be discontinued. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the <br /> public hearing closed. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Brandes, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that <br /> Resolution No. 90-91 be adopted, based on a review of an initial <br /> ._ environmental impact study done for this project and on a finding <br /> that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined <br /> in the City's guidelines and on a further finding that a negative <br /> declaration is appropriate in connection with PUD-90-5, the <br /> application of James Fazzari for development plan approval to <br /> create an approximately 1.3 acre site to accommodate an existing <br /> single-family residence and related improvements and an <br /> approximately 3.7 acre site for future phase development for an <br /> approximately five acre site located at 3710 Trenery Drive. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr inquired if the City intends to preserve the walnut <br /> trees, and if so, would the removal of the water easement <br /> jeopardize this. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that these are not production walnut trees <br /> and do not need a lot of water. The survival of the trees through <br /> summer without water would depend on the condition of the trees <br /> and the ground water level. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes commented that the survival of the trees would <br /> depend on whether or not the owner decides to water them rather <br /> than on the easement. <br /> <br /> - 5 - <br /> 5-15-90 <br /> <br /> <br />