CCMIN101690 - Laserfiche WebLink

77 .... Mr. Butler agreed with Mr. Brandes. It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Mr. Mercer, that a credit fee of $5,000 per unit be established, as set forth in the Staff Report, subject to the condition that the amount would be reviewed annually. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Tarver and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None QO ABSTAIN: None 1--- It was moved by Mr. Tarver that the low-income housing fund < remain as established in lieu of creating a new low- and moderate- Z income housing fund. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Butler commented that he does not recall any discussion on the new fund replacing the existing low-income housing fund. Mr. Brandes inquired if the ordinance, as written, includes low-, lower-, and moderate-income housing. .... Ms. Acosta said yes. She explained that a line was added that allows part of the fund to be spent on moderate-housing at the Council's discretion. It was moved by Mr. Brandes that it be understood that the fees established under the Housing Element of the General Plan and the Lower-Income Housing Fee include both lower- and moderate- income housing units. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Butler requested a clarification on the relationship between the existing and the proposed housing fee. Ms. Acosta explained that the City currently has a low-income housing fee that can be used only for lower- or low-income projects. The proposed ordinance includes the possibility of using the housing fund monies for moderate-income housing, at the discretion of the Council. Mr. Brandes commented that a technicality was involved in the Bren Company's $100,000 affordable housing fee contribution and that it should be credited towards the project's low-income housing fee. 10-16-90 - 21 -