Laserfiche WebLink
75 <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Ms. Scribner, that <br />the proposed PUD modification is consistent with the General Plan <br />and that Ordinance No. 1527 be introduced, to be read by title only <br />and waiving further reading thereof, approving Hacienda Business <br />Park Modification to Parking Standards, PUD-85-8-7M/PUD-81-30-25M, <br />for industrial and office uses from four parking spaces per 1,000 <br />gross square feet of building area to three parking spaces per <br />1,000 gross square feet of building area, subject to the conditions <br />listed in Exhibit "B". <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 6b <br />AP-91-6 (Z-91-65) Spieker Partners, appeal of a decision of the <br />Design Review Board denying the application of Spieker Partners to <br />install two additional tenant identification signs on the existing <br />freeway Dylon sign for Rose Pavillion Shopping Center. Zoning for <br />the property is PUD - Commercial District. (SR 91:434) <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the <br />application. <br /> <br /> Peter Schnugg, 6000 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton <br />representing Spieker Partners, requested Council to reverse the <br />decision of the Design Review Board which denied the two tenant <br />signs. At its origin, the Rose Pavillion Shopping Center was <br />comprised of 180,000 square feet, anchored by Longs Drug Store, <br />Simon Home Center and a to-be-named-later super market. That was <br />the PUD application under which this existing pylon sign was <br />approved. At that time it was felt that those stores were all <br />there was going to be. However, he feels this is an important <br />issue for the success of the Center if Ethan Allen and Galaxy 8 <br />Cinemas can be tied together with the Rose Pavillion. As it stands <br />right now the conception is that these two operations are separate <br />entities. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver commented on the fact that the sign itself does not <br />even spell out "The Rose Pavillion" but rather uses the symbol of <br />a rose to indicate the shopping center. He feels that the other <br />tenants would also want to be advertised as being in the Rose <br />Pavillion. <br /> <br />10-15-91 11 <br /> <br /> <br />