Laserfiche WebLink
75 <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked what form the General Plan Review Committee was <br />going to take and would it be a steering committee or open to the <br />public. She felt that Council was not willing to open it to the <br />public as a "free for all" committee. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer disagreed. He was pleased with the results of <br />the previous general plan committee, although it was costly to the <br />City. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler felt that this discussion was not about anything <br />beyond the staff work. He felt that Mr. Swift would be able to <br />indicate the amount of time and staff involved in this regardless <br />what kind or size of committee there would be. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver felt that it might be possible to get Council, the <br />Planning Commission, and those on the Steering Committee together <br />to discuss the General Plan and the San Francisco Property. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer felt that staff should be spending its time on <br />the following plans for advance planning: North Sycamore, Ruby <br />Hill, Vineyard Avenue, South Pleasanton General plan, and the <br />General Plan. Those listed should be a priority. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta stated that the General Plan update, the San <br />Francisco Specific Plan, the South Pleasanton General Plan Study, <br />and the Ridgelands Plan could not be completed at the same time. <br />She indicated that staff suggested that the General Plan update be <br />completed and then the San Francisco Specific Plan. Once those are <br />complete the others would follow. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked why the South Pleasanton General Plan Study was <br />not going to be considered with the General Plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift explained that the South Pleasanton General Plan <br />Study would be more specific but somewhat the same as the General <br />Plan update. Mr. Moore would like to process a simultaneous PUD <br />proposal for his three lots and staff had told him that the overall <br />area would need to reviewed together, as done in other projects. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver reiterated his recommendation to support on- going <br />projects and the General Plan update with the other projects would <br />then to follow the completion of the General Plan update. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner agreed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta again explained staff's recommendation. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer suggested meeting with the San Francisco Property <br />Task Force and all of those involved to talk about timelines for <br />these projects. <br /> <br />6/2/92 21 <br /> <br /> <br />