Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Mercer commented on Mr. Tarver's earlier statement. The <br />Ridgelands Committee was accused of being stacked and beared and <br />Council decided the best way to handle the San Francisco Property <br />would be to create a Steering Committee. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver stated that the composition of the Steering <br />Committee in terms of balance is what he was concerned with. He <br />suggested that citizens at large serve, including the people that <br />were interviewed and others who are interested in participating. <br />Mr. Tarver believed that Council and the Commissions would have <br />plent of opportunity to review the plan in the property. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked if the Committee which was being appointed <br />could be used as a Steering Committee to get the General Plan <br />review started. She thought that this would be a good group of <br />people for this job. She understood that those currently on the <br />Steering Committee would need to be asked if they would be willing <br />to serve as the Committee for the General Plan process as well. <br />Ms. Mohr also felt that the capability of staff to deal with the <br />work load would be improved. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer indicated that staff had already began working on <br />the General Plan. He believed that the people who applied for the <br />San Francisco Property Steering Committee did not apply for a <br />General Plan Review Committee. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta stated that the report indicated that staff could <br />work on the General Plan and the San Francisco Specific Plan <br />project at the same time. She stated that staff would work on the <br />Plans together if Council wished it to do so. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked if there was staff time to complete a five <br />month study on San Francisco Plan. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta stated that staff was suggesting that the South <br />Pleasanton Plan and the Pleasanton Ridge be delayed until the <br />General Plan and San Francisco Plan were complete. Unless the <br />other projects were paid for entirely by the applicants the <br />projects would have to wait. She said that the timing of the <br />projects was for Council's discussion. The General Plan Study <br />could take from 9 to 12 months. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner felt that the General Plan should be completed <br />first because it should be known if there are to be any changes <br />before specifically planning a project. <br /> <br /> There was discussion by Council regarding the timing of the <br />various plans. <br /> <br />6/~/9~ ~0 <br /> <br /> <br />