CCMIN021699 - Laserfiche WebLink

math, and using the Alisal Improvement Association plan method would result in an average increase to future Alisal residents of $5,545 per house and in the golf course system $8,415 per house, the upper Sportono area $2,278 per house, the flat land $7,010 per house and the TTK development $8,890 per house. If the Alisal Improvement Association method results in an increase to undeveloped land that is outside the loop, it is clear to him that the Happy Valley community is subsidizing the project. He did not feel this was fair. He said if subsidizing developers is the only way to finance the sewer and water systems, then many of the homeowners in Happy Valley will protest the annexation. The main reason to annex is to have reasonable sewer and water costs. He said the questionnaire regarding the annexation was very confusing. He suggested another questionnaire be sent out, stating if the Alisal Improvement Association method is used would people annex and sign up for water and sewer. He did not feel it was fair to subsidize the developers. A1 Spotorno, Sycamore Road, submitted changes to Exhibit A of the agricultural report. The agricultural policy is for the whole city, not just for Happy Valley. There are going to be many conflicts that need to be resolved in order to have viable, sustainable, economic and agricultural element in the General Plan. He has had on-going discussions with staff that resulted in a revised Exhibit A submitted this evening. He has had input from the whole state to come up with a plan that mitigates any problems between the urban and agricultural community. There were no other speakers. Ms. Michelotti asked staff to explain why certain properties are excluded from the annexation application. Mr. Roush said the direction from Council was to include the parcels if the litigation could be resolved prior to LAFCO taking action. In order for LAFCO to take action it has to have a completed application. Therefore, following the Council meeting there were discussions with the three property owners' attorneys to see if the lawsuit would be withdrawn so the properties could be included in the annexation application. Two of the property owners have not withdrawn from the lawsuit; therefore they were not included in the application to LAFCO. The application is consistent with the resolution. Ms. Ayala asked if Mr. Barlow' s name change request had to be discussed tonight Mayor Tarver said no. Ms. Ayala asked if Mr. Chapman and Mr. Schafer were willing to withdraw their litigation to be included in the annexation. Mr. Schafer said a letter has been submitted to the City Attomey's office. He could not make a comment at this time. Pleasanton City Council 26 02/16/99 Minutes