PC 040705 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2005--14 was entered and adopted as rnotioned_ b_ PUD 43_ Paul Bercbem/Bercbem Trust Application for (1 J PUD Development Plan approval to demolish the existing 1 ,628-square-foot home and. construct a new 4,035-square-foot, single-story residence at 2538 Vineyard Avenue, in the Vineyard Avcn ue C'orridor Specific Plan Area; and ~2) the creation of site development standards for the subject site. Zoning for the property is PLJ LJ-L[7 R. (Planned Unit Development - Low Dctisity Residenrial~ District. Ms_ Decker summarized the staff report and described the proposed project. She noted that numerous disclosures were tied to this property that must be recorded in the City Attorney's oft-ice, specifically that the property is an access point to the East Bay Regional Park District property- Commissioner Arlcin would like to see that disclosure recorded on the deed. Ms. Nerland cont3rmed that there would be a disclosure on the deed, in addition to a separate document to be recorded with the title- Ms. Decker displayed pictures of the eucalyptus screening on the site as well. as the site plan regarding the quarry and mining operations. In response to an inquiry by C=ommissioncr Blank, Ms. Decker replied that there was a requirement that the eucalyptus grove remain intact and that the plan meet the planting and spacing requirements- The Specit3c Plan requires that the fencing be open fencing rather than an enclosed wall at the entry- She displayed a photo simulation of what the building would look like and showed stonework enhancements on the buildings. Cotrtmissioner Arkin believed the design would benefit Isom extending the stonework from the chimney down to the ground. Ms_ Decker noted that staff favored a slate roof over the typical concrete the roof to match the Style of the building better; the applicant accepted that condition- She proposed several aazend meats to the conditions of approval: 1. Condition 16.a., a requirement to provide an easement to maintain underground wells and holding tanks for non-potable irrigation use, should be omitted because of its erroneous addition- 2. Condition 16. b., related to dedication of the trail to the City, and CJondition 34, addressing various deed restrictions and. covenants, will be combined into one condition that would state that all recorded documents mentioned in both conditions will be provided in a form acceptable to the City Attorney's OPFicc prior to issuance of_building permits. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENS D_ PLANNING COMMISSION MI NZ7TES April 7, 2005 Page 1 1 0l 15