14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Table 8 - Comparative Development Impact Fees (Only Housing) Pleasanton Dublin/Liv Pleasanton Maximum Dublin Livermore ermore Current Percent of Housing Percent of Land Use Housing Fee Housing Fee Average Housing Fee Average Fee Average Single Family(per 3.000 sq ft unit) $20,965 $37,905 $29,435 $27.187 92% $44,930 153% Multi-Family(per 1.200 sq ft unit) 20.965 23,940 22.453 15,694 70% 37,358 166% Retail(13,070 sq ft) 13,724 15.684 14.704 40,125 273% 2,758,816 18763% Office(15,250 sq ft sq ft) 19.825 11,743 15.784 46,818 297% 1.259.040 7977% Industrial (15,680 sq ft)* 7.840 1,725 4,782 48,138 1007% 1,294,541 27069% Highest Fee Lowest Fee Comparing Pleasanton's Affordable Housing fees to the average of Dublin/Livermore indicates that the current fee for single family homes is 92% of the average of Dublin/Livermore and increases to 153% under the maximum fee scenario. The multi- family home fee is currently 70% of the average of Dublin/Livermore but the maximum fee is 166% of the average of Dublin/Livermore. The Affordable Housing fee for commercial land uses for both the current fee and the maximum fee identified in the nexus study are exponentially greater than the Dublin/Livermore average. Staff Recommendations To help ensure Pleasanton's Development Impact Fees are commensurate with nearby cities, staff's goal is for Pleasanton's cumulative Development Impact Fees to be equal to or less than the average of Dublin and Livermore's cumulative Development Impact Fees. To that end, the following is the methodology staff used to develop recommended fee levels: • Set fees by land use category at the maximum allowed in the study unless it results in cumulative fees exceeding the average of Dublin and Livermore; • If the maximum allowed by land use category results in greater cumulative fees than the average of Dublin and Livermore, set the fee at the average of Dublin and Livermore; and/or • If the existing cumulative fees by land use category is greater than the average of Dublin and Livermore, than no change to the existing fee. This methodology results in the following cumulative Development Impact fees by typical size development in each land use category: Page 10 of 18