My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 84578
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
RES 84578
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 4:18:04 PM
Creation date
1/27/2000 11:27:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/13/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CAMP DRESSER & McKEEINC. <br /> <br />Mr. Robert L. Warnick <br />October 29, 1984 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Determine physical properties of the soil and the under- <br />lying bedrock, perform a geotechnical analysis, and <br />prepare bearing pressure, earthquake loads, and other <br />geotechnical parameters for reservoir design and site <br />grading. <br /> <br />e. Prepare a report describing a. through d. above. <br /> <br />Task 3 - Develop Preliminary Design A1 ternatives <br /> <br />Tentative design alternatives will be formulated. The alternatives <br />will include various reservoir locations, types, configurations, <br />grading, and screening schemes for the reservoir. The overflow eleva- <br />tion will be maintained to match the overflow at the existing Bonde <br />Reservoir. <br /> <br />A 1.8 million gallon steel reservoir at grade will probably be the <br />least cost alternative. However, the limitations of the site may pre- <br />clude construction of a steel reservoir if a shielding berm to totally <br />screen the reservoir is found to be necessary. One alternative that <br />will be studied is the screening all owed by partially burying a steel <br />reservoir and providing additional screening with trees. Other alter- <br />natives will include buried and partially buried concrete reservoirs. <br /> <br />Freehand sketches and preliminary cost estimates will be prepared for <br />each of the feasible alternatives. The alternatives will then be <br />evaluated relative to each other, considering reservoir type, con- <br />struction costs, maintenance costs, aesthetics, visual impacts, and <br />other aspects. <br /> <br />Task 4 - Meet with City Staff <br /> <br />Upon completion of Task 3, CDM will meet with the City to discuss the <br />design alternatives and any problems or constraints associated with <br />the alternatives. Based on these discussions, a recommended alter- <br />native will be jointly adopted by the City and CDM. <br /> <br />Task 5 - Prepare Preliminary Design and Construction Cost Estimate <br /> <br />Using the alternative adopted in Task 4, the tentative design will be <br />expanded to produce a preliminary design for the proposed reservoir- <br />This preliminary design will include piping and valving arrangements, <br />reservoir dimensions, site grading, and other features, together with <br />the preliminary design for the proposed pipeline and access road. The <br />preliminary design will be prepared in sufficient detail to develop a <br />reliable preliminary cost estimate for the completed work, and a <br />detailed preliminary cost estimate for these facilities will be <br />prepared. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.