My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
040709
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2009 12:00:14 PM
Creation date
4/1/2009 12:00:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/7/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
68 <br />Discussion on the Alameda County Ooen Soace Ordinance <br />Mr. Mercer indicated that the Alameda County Board of <br />Supervisors has made a decision to send back the General Plan open <br />Space Element to the Planning Commission for public hearing and <br />comments. <br />Mr. Roush stated he had this item as a closed session item to <br />be discussed with the Council. <br />Discussion on Footh+rr Road S reet Livhts <br />Mr. Brandes stated that he has received phone calls regarding <br />the street lights on Foothill Road along the Golden Eagle Farms <br />development. He explained that the lights are placed at very <br />close intervals, and the residents are concerned about the effect <br />of those lights on their houses. He asked how this was decided on <br />and if it could be reviewed. <br />Mr. Elliott replied that the placements of street lights was <br />discussed at the time the design was laid out. It was decided <br />that the lights would be placed in accordance with the City~s <br />street light spacing standards. He recalled no objections at that <br />time. <br />Mr. Brandes requested Mr. Elliott to specifically check the <br />actions taken by the Planning Commission and the Council regarding - <br />the matter and to stop further street light installations until <br />this is settled. <br />Ma. Mohr inquired if there would be street lights for Laguna <br />Oaks. <br />Mr. Swift replied that lighting plans along major streets are <br />not normally discussed as part of a PUD. However, this would <br />certainly be considered when the final PUD, which is now pending, <br />comes back. It will also be discussed when the project comes <br />before the Council. <br />9 CITY COUNCIr COMMrTTEF REPORT <br />There were no City Council Committee reports presented at <br />this meeting. <br />10. MATTERS CONmrNUED FOR DECISION <br />There were no matters continued for decision presented at <br />this meeting. <br />11. REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br />There were no reports of the Boards or Commissions presented <br />at this meeting. <br />-22- <br />2-6-90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.