My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
031709
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2009 11:58:06 AM
Creation date
3/12/2009 10:04:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/17/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINANCIAL STATEMENT <br />The original project costs are approximately $2 million. These funds are currently in the <br />Capital Improvement Program. Total additional project costs for the City if <br />undergrounding is added are estimated to be between $2.5 million and $3 million, which <br />includes design cost, utility approvals and 60%-80% of the construction cost (which is <br />shared with the utility companies). Approximately $400,000 of this cost would be <br />required to redesign the project with undergrounding. No source of funds for the <br />additional costs for undergrounding has been identified. Once public bids are received, <br />staff will have a more accurate estimate of the construction costs for the project and <br />Council will be able to make a more informed decision to either move ahead with <br />undergrounding or complete the project as originally planned. <br />The underground utility district improvements, once accepted by the public utility <br />companies, will be operated and maintained by the respective utility companies and <br />have no financial impact on City maintenance and operation costs. <br />BACKGROUND <br />Project Description <br />The original Stanley Boulevard roadway was constructed in the late 1800's. The <br />customary design at that time was to elevate the roadways higher than adjacent <br />properties to keep them high and dry. As a result, the current roadway is higher than <br />the adjacent properties. In addition to performing a transportation function, modern <br />roadways are designed to perform the secondary function of collecting and conveying <br />storm flows. Storm runoff from properties adjacent to a roadway typically drain to the <br />street where public roadway and private storm water is collected in the gutter-pan and <br />conveyed to catch basins which funnel storm waters below ground and off of the <br />roadway system. On Stanley Boulevard, because of the difference in elevation between <br />the roadway and the adjacent properties, the project design includes lowering portions <br />of the street grade by approximately 1 foot to ensure the necessary positive drainage <br />from the private properties onto the street surface. This involves removing the original <br />concrete cement roadway under the existing roadway pavement and re-establishing a <br />standard roadway street cross slope of 2 percent. This approach, including the addition <br />of curb and gutter and minor storm drain facilities, will capture all storm drain runoff <br />falling directly onto the public roadway. At some locations on Stanley Boulevard, the <br />private property elevations are significantly lower (3 to 4 feet) than the existing and <br />proposed street grade, and lowering the roadway surface to accommodate these <br />properties is not practical. <br />During the design process for the street roadway section, several design challenges <br />were encountered which influenced the final roadway horizontal alignment. The design <br />challenges included designing around the location of existing power poles, heritage <br />trees, private hedges, mailboxes, decorative driveways, and fences within the public <br />right-of-way. Other challenges included the removal of the concrete slab under the <br />roadway, conforming the driveways to lower adjacent properties, and providing for <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.