11 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

I, . . V. PUBLIC NOTICE t_ Notices regazding the proposed conditional use permit application and related public hearing were mailed to property owners and tenants within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Craig Schwab, owner of 4431 Stoneridge Drive, contacted staff concerning the proposal. After learning that the proposed after school program would not be using any outdoor area, Mr. Schwab stated that he has no further concerns. VI. FINDINGS The Planning Commission must make the following findings prior to granting of a use permit: A. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. Objectives of the zoning ordinance include: fostering a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, protecting existing land use from inharmonious influences and harmful intrusions; and insuring that public and private lands ultimately are used for the purposes which aze most appropriate and beneficial to the City as a whole. The existing church operation has been compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, and staff feels that the proposed after school daycare program is an ancillary use which is common to churches and which would be consistent with the above-cited objectives. The subject site is zoned Planned Unit Development -Industrial (PUD-I), where the development plan includes a common landscape area. The proposed after school program would not alter in any way the existing landscaping azea. In addition, the operation of the after school program would not interfere with surrounding businesses' ability to operate as all related activities would be held inside the building. The anticipated number of employees and school children will not generate any unusual demands on the existing pazking for the office complex or the surrounding properties. Furthermore, the applicant will be required to mitigate any nuisances that may occur as a result of the proposed after school program. Therefore, staff feels this finding can be made. B. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Case No. PCUP-84 Planning Commissron Page - 7 -