Laserfiche WebLink
II. Draft Final Environmental Impact Report for the Stoneridge Drive <br />Specific Plan Amendment/Staples Ranch Project <br />Retain the second paragraph of mitigation measure VQ-3.1 on page 4- <br />8. <br />Retain the Following Paragraph <br />Energy efficient lamp technologies shall be incorporated wherever <br />possible. Mercury vapor shall be avoided. Incandescent lights shall <br />be avoided unless they are integrated with a control mechanism that <br />limits their operation time. The use of such lighting shall help minimize <br />impacts on reduced visibility of the night sky. <br />{Staff recommends that this paragraph be retained. Mercury vapor is <br />considered to be one of the least energy efficient lighting sources.} <br />2. Remove mitigation measure PH-1.1 (concerning growth management) <br />and revise text. <br />A. Pape 4-11, immediately before section "3.9 Transportation", revise <br />to include the following text: <br />3.8 Population, Employment, and Housing <br />Page 3.8-7, PH-1, is revised as follows: <br />PH-1. The proposed project would increase population and <br />employment in the Project Area and the overall projected <br />growth would be consistent with growth forecasts for the City;, <br />r~ivv:c:c~ Since the senior continuing care community weuld <br />h~.~ ~ti s +',.i t_ .~....~* ... _.. a vea^.,_e .,s fhe ~...._~~ <br />r ............. .. <br />9rdiaans~ will have a Development Agreement, the Growth <br />Management Ordinance will not be applicable. In this case, <br />timing of development will be required to be consistent with <br />the provisions of a Development Agreement for the protect. <br />The City Council would need to examine the proiect and <br />Development Agreement in light of how many units it believes <br />are appropriate for construction in a given year. (~ <br />Recommended Revisions <br />Page 5 <br />