16 - Laserfiche WebLink

RESOLUTION No. 48- RESOLUTION RESOLVING CASE PAP-121, THEREBY AMENDING THE PLANNING CoMMISSIoN'S APPROVAL of THE APPLICATION of JANNY RoCHA FoR A CoNDII'IoNAL USE PERMIT, AS FILED UNDER CASE PCUP-Z45 1NHEREAS, Janny Rocha has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to relocate and replace a 5,000-gallon water tank in the rear yard of the property located at 481 Sycamore Road; and 1NHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-A Planned Unit Development - Agriculture} District; and 1NHEREAS, at its meeting of April 9, 2008, the Planning Commission, having considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of City staff concerning this application, approved the Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, Phillip and Joanna Segundo submitted an appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Co~~~ncil; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of August 19, 2008, the City Council received a report from the Director of Planning and Community Development, together with a copy of the staff report to the Planning Commission, regarding this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on August 19, 2008, at which time the appellants, the applicant, and any other member of the public were offered an opportunity to present evidence regarding the appeal; and WHEREAS, after a review of the materials presented, the City Council directed the parties and staff to meet and resolve the disagreement; and WHEREAS, the parties met with staff on several occasions and were able to reach an agreement; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of January 20, 2009, the City Council received a report from the Director of Community Development regarding the resolution of the disagreement between the parties; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 20, 2009, at which time the appellants, the applicant, and any other member of the public were offered an opportunity to present evidence regarding the appeal; and WHEREAS, after a review of the materials presented, the City Council was able to make the findings that the proposed Conditional Use, as conditioned, is appropriate for the site and is consistent with the zoning regulations of the zoning district of the property.