Laserfiche WebLink
r. <br />If such units were to be counted as housing units and applied towards the cap, <br />fewer conventional housing units would be available to be built under the cap than are <br />now anticipated. <br />Regarding secottd units, they would not be counted due to the provision of State <br />law that mandates that second units shall ± of be counted as housing units for the purposes <br />of any policy to limit residential growth. <br />Regarding assisted living facilities, the City's historical practice has been to <br />consider such facilities as commercial uses and therefore not counted as "housing units" <br />towards the housing cap. is This has been the practice because these facilities have been <br />generally approved in commercially caned areas, have characteristics of commercial <br />facilities (e.g., employees, provision of services for the elderly, central dining, payment <br />of commercial impact fees), and garerally do not create the same type of impacts on the <br />community as do residential developmema. Examples of this include Eden Villa (the <br />assisted living facility on Mohr Avenue) and the City's Parlcview Assisted Living Facility <br />(on Valley Ave.). <br />Notwithstanding these factors, the City Council has previously indicated that if <br />the Continuing Life Care (CLC) proposal on Staples Ranch were to be approved, the City <br />may count 240 (of the proposed 63~ assisted living units toward the housing cap, based <br />on a formula that considers a number of impacts of such a facility on the community. If <br />the Council, in talring action on the CLC project, were to wont the entire number of <br />assisted living amts (63~ as "housing units" towards the housing cap, then it would <br />further reduce the number of wnvartional housing units that could be developed <br />elsewhere in the City under the housing cap by 396.16 <br />4.2. Egect of Initiative on Consistency of General Plea sad any 3peciifc Plain <br />A General Plaa has bear called the 'constitution' for developmart within a city. <br />As with any tow policies added to a General Plan, these new policies are required by <br />State law to be wnsistart with the existing policies, programs and element within the <br />General Plan. To the extent that Initiative's new General Plan policies conflict with <br />policies in Specific Plana, the Specific Plan policies could not be implemented and would <br />need to be revised to be consistent with the new Genera( Plan policies. <br />" See Goveroment Code 463!32.2 (a) (2). <br />Is Eves if it wero debrmined that assisted Hviog unit arc housing unit for purposes of the homin` ~ <br />proviously approved assisted living unit would not be counted towards the bossing cap, sirKe inidatlvas <br />(a any other poUcy or ordinance) aro not usually applied retroactively, unless specifically stated <br />As of January 21109, these was a potential far 2,733 uoih left under the housin` cap, Reducirr` thin by <br />240 unit for CLC would leave 2,313; redtrein` $ instead by the toll 63ti unit for CLC would leave 2, l 19 <br />unit. Moreover, any of these number would be reduced by tht number of buildins permit that have bees <br />issued between January 2007 and now. <br />