15 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

The major hill area developments remaining in the City that would be potentially impacted by the Initiative are as follows: Table 1 Transferring residential development from hillside properties to infill properties would ~ not impact the City's ability to meet its current regional housing needs since the self- - imposedlimit Wour Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) is 29,000 units -the housing cap. However, to the extent that 119 to 224 hillside units are developed in infill areas of the City rather than the hillsides, it is likely that such units would be higher density, multiple family dwellings or smaller single family homes; some would likely be able to qualify as very low, low, and/or moderate income units. This would help Pleasanton is attaining our lower income share of the RHNA numbers. u~++•±~a Uat De 'lion: 1..=. Regtuding the portion of the Initiative that deSnes "housing unit", the question has been raised as to whether assisted living units and second units must be included as "housing units" and therefore counted towards the housing °ap•13 (See also Section 5.20, below.) r Number otpotendal dwelling unit per Oenenl Plm Midpoim Density ~ Number of uoib estimated under Inidatiw estimate baud ~ dew(opar's estimate o[minimum • Ltitiatlw dos nd sppear to atlbct Spotarro Flat; haw not hero number of uoib needed ro lbnd Bypaa Itoad. Veri&atton of developer assumpdoDf conStmed by suHat this tints. It is also questionable whether the hutiatiw prechtdes the Bypass !toad (us Section 3.7). ,a Assuming project owrmmed by referendum: Dwallio f Uaib (DU) based an approved Pmjat u Total with Spotorao Upper Valley and OaltGrow /Total with Spotorno Plat without Oak Grow " Total with Spotortw Upper Valley /Total with Spotottto Plat The applicatiea of the Initiative's detlnitian of "housing unit" would be prospective ody fa new project, a the Initiative did not iocluda laaguaga speeiAeally providing fa retieactivity.