My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111208
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 111208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:50 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 1:27:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/12/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 111208
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
order to secure planning entitlements. She noted that this will be required at the time <br />the applicant applies for Building and Safety Division permits. <br />Ms. Amos stated that the next question relates to Question 18: "I don't see the answer <br />to Question 18 in the packet regarding how the temperature requirement inside to be <br />between 68 and 85 degrees in Title 22 meshes with the open loading dock door issue. <br />Your response references responses to No. 14 but I don't see anything addressed there <br />in the response to No. 14. Please send me the State's response or point out where it is <br />if I am missing it. Please ask CCLD in writing if this was not asked." Ms. Amos stated <br />that the applicant will maintain the temperature between 68 and 85 degrees when it is <br />required through the existing air-conditioning and heating unit, such that even if the <br />roll-up door is open in the winter, the heating will be running to maintain a constant <br />temperature, as required by the State. Ms. Amos indicated that State Licensing has <br />verbally conveyed to staff that this is fine because the door is only open periodically and <br />will not drop the temperature too much and the applicant is maintaining it through those <br />requirements. Ms. Amos added that Title 22 is enforced by the State and not the local <br />government. <br />Regarding the next question: "I don't see responses to No. 19 which relates to the Title <br />22 requirements that rooms with kitchen/food preparation not have children present. <br />The site plan is still labeled `KitchenlStudy Room."' Ms. Amos stated that although the <br />room is labeled such, it is not a kitchen per se because it has only a sink and <br />refrigerator and no cooking equipment or stoves. She added that State Licensing has <br />found that it is fine forthe children to be in that center since it includes just a sink and <br />refrigerator. <br />With respect to the next question: "For the Disaster Plan, I don't see a letter from the <br />city granting permission forthe temporary relocation to the Public Library or Orloff Park. <br />Where is it?" Ms. Amos stated that no permit is required in the event of an emergency <br />to provide a safe haven for a business, patrons, adults, or children who may exit into or <br />use City properties, such as the library or parks. <br />Commissioner Fox stated that she asked this question because the Child Care <br />Licensing Application asks for a Disaster Plan, including two places to be in case of a <br />disaster. She added that it requests, in parentheses, that the property owner submit a <br />letter indicating the two places cited for the Disaster Plan. Ms. Amos replied that was <br />correct and that the State did acknowledge this. She added that for City facilities, such <br />as a park orthe public library, the State requires that there be a disclosure that parents <br />need to be aware of simply where their children will be in the event of a disaster. <br />Regarding the next question: "I asked the city previously whether the city inspects the <br />sandbox daily at Orloff Park per Title 22 (Sandboxes shall be inspected daily and kept <br />free of foreign materials). The response related to weekly and references CPSC <br />recommendations. Can the city please address the question as it relates to Title 22 <br />requirements (daily) not CPSC recommendations?" Ms. Amos replied that the City <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 12, 2008 Page 5 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.