PC 111208 - Laserfiche WebLink

In response to Commissioner Fox's inquiry if the car parts business doing the lacquer process was in Suite C, Ms. Amos replied that they do conduct lacquer applications. She noted that there is a car operations center located in the building across from it. Ms. Amos then discussed the applicant's operations and transportation services. She added that there were questions submitted by Commissioner Fox, which she read out loud as follows: "1. Regarding the handgun referred to in the Dublin letter; can the police follow up on whether it was loaded or unloaded? "2. Regarding the location of the handgun, can the police follow up on whether it was locked or unlocked? "3. Regarding the location of the handgun, can the police follow up on whether it was out in the open or not?" Ms. Amos responded to questions, stating that the information is not available to the public and that the applicant would be able to respond and clarify. Commissioner 0' Connor inquired if staff asked Dublin directly, and Ms. Amos replied that the information was not available for public review. Commissioner O'Connor inquired why Dublin would not simply answerthe question and asked if this was privileged information. Ms. Amos replied that staff had posed these questions, and Dublin indicated that all information that can be released has already been provided to staff through correspondence. Commissioner Fox asked if this was the reason the questions were included in the packet, stating she had asked them back on October 17t". Ms. Amos said no but that this was what Dublin responded to. Ms. Amos noted that Commissioner Fox had additional questions regarding responses found in the pumpkin-orange-colored book. She stated that the first question requested clarification on Question 27, 89, and 91 regarding if the childcare facility was an E-occupancy building. Ms. Amos clarified that it is an E-occupancy building, based upon the change in use to childcare. Ms. Amos continued that the next question was: "The Building and Professions Code require that a change of occupancy type have architect- orengineer-approved plans. Since the occupancy is changing from B to E (per the staff report, it is an E), where are the plans signed by the architect since state law requires that anytime an occupancy type if changed, it requires signed plans. I've asked this question before. This is a state requirement beyond the city's requirements." Ms. Amos stated that while this is a requirement, it is one that is required by the Building and Safety Division and not in PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 12, 2008 Page 4 of 29