My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 070908
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 070908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:37:45 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 12:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/9/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 070908
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor referred to the architect not planning on planting trees <br />on the west side slope; however, he confirmed with Mr. Munn that there is a <br />condition of approval in this regard. Mr. Munn said they will work with staff and <br />the landscape architect and are amenable to doing whatever is needed. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that there are some windows that are not so <br />reflective and he confirmed with Mr. Munn that they would not have a mirror <br />finish. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired what the exact maximum height of the structure was, <br />and Mr. Munn replied that the staff report indicates 27 feet but in reality, the <br />height is 26 feet, 6 inches to the top of the roof deck, with asix-inch buffer for the <br />roof material. <br />Commissioner Fox confirmed with Ms. Decker that Mr. Munn's statement on <br />height was correct. Ms. Decker confirmed that it was correct. <br />Mary Greene stated that she lives at the west side of the proposed building. She <br />noted that she had received notice of the meeting rather late and with the <br />holiday, she was not sure other neighbors would be present at the meeting. She <br />voiced concern that the house had the same square footage and that even <br />though it met the standards, she still felt it was too large; therefore, she believed <br />everything would need to be reduced. She stated that they were contacted last <br />year by Mr. Ed Lamb saying that the fence on their property and the Bach's <br />property had been put in the wrong place in 1970 and that the fence had to be <br />moved or she would have to pay for the compensation of land. She stated that <br />she contacted staff and indicated to the City that they could put the new fence <br />where it belonged, but it seemed that with all of the surveys done and recorded <br />which they paid for, it made more sense than simply putting sticks into the <br />ground. She referred to the ten-foot easement on page 5 of the staff report <br />relating to accessory structures, noting that that no structures can ever be placed <br />ten feet on either side of the property easement, and questioned whether this <br />related to all four properties. She said the house was huge on a pad that is a <br />good 20 feet above their home and recommended the house be lowered. She <br />also questioned the actual house size per each lot. She stated that she had <br />worked in the Escrow Department of Wells Fargo and has typed many legal <br />descriptions. She noted that these documents always had to be very accurate <br />and requested that things be clarified on the actual square footages and sizes of <br />the houses. <br />Brad Walker said he and his wife, Ann, own Lot 2 on Sycamore Terrace and <br />have no objection to the design of the property. He requested that the buffer on <br />the south property line be changed to evergreen trees so privacy is constant <br />throughout the year. He said they put a lot of thought in the location of the <br />bedroom for Parcel 3 where there will not be windows looking down at them at all <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 9, 2008 Page 6 of 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.