My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 070908
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 070908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:37:45 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 12:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/9/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 070908
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b. PDR-717, Tarlochan Sidhu <br />Application for design review approval to construct an approximately <br />4,716-square-foot two-story single-family home on an approximately <br />18,285-square-foot site located at 6047 Sycamore Terrace. Zoning for the <br />property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development -Low Density <br />Residential) District. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Greg Munn, Project Architect, Design Tech Associates, Pleasanton, noted that <br />he had designed similar homes in the City and was aware of the City's design <br />philosophies. He stated that the site was challenging due to its limited footprint <br />as a result of the bioswale around the perimeter of the upper pad where the <br />house would be placed. He indicated that he took into account that there are two <br />residences that looked down upon the site and that in his design, he oriented the <br />house to place the least used rooms such as an office, a guest room, and the <br />living room in the rear facing northwest, looking towards the graveyards, so as <br />not to impact the neighbors below, and the master bedroom and bath upstairs. <br />He noted that there are secondary bedrooms along the back only a volume <br />ceiling above the living room to achieve light and architectural impact. He added <br />that he had moved all high-traffic living areas in the back facing northwest which <br />overlooks the graveyard. <br />Mr. Munn noted that the lot had so many restrictions as far as a 27-foot height <br />limit and that they went through six or seven design scenarios in order to have <br />the house fit on the lot with the client's criteria. He indicated that he had met <br />on-site once with the Greene's who had problems with them not planting on the <br />slope bank along their side. He noted that trees do not grow well on a slope <br />bank when planted and that if the Greene's wanted screening from the property, <br />it would be better to locate it on their property where they could grow it as mature <br />as they wanted. In summary, Mr. Munn said they tried to take into account the <br />best design with the least impact on the neighbors. <br />Commissioner Olson inquired if there was a view easement from this property to <br />the west, and Mr. Munn said there was none; the actual views to the west were <br />very limited because there were eucalyptus trees blocking the views. He stated <br />that they mainly went to the southwest corridor if they could, noting there was no <br />real backyard to the home because of the bioswale. He stated that it was very <br />difficult to get the house design to work, given height limits, and added that there <br />was concern with sun reflecting off of the windows. He noted that he had <br />designed two other nearby homes and that there is no way of controlling <br />windows and reflections from the sun. <br />Commissioner Olson confirmed with Mr. Munn that it looks like there were two <br />additional lots that could be built on. Mr. Munn said the lot orients toward the <br />uphill side more than anywhere. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 9, 2008 Page 5 of 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.