RES 85536 - Laserfiche WebLink

within a public service easement if necessary. Without developer cooperation, this;program could still be accomplished but at some cost to the City. Staff suggests that cooperative efforts be undertaken first; if City monitoring involvement is necessary, staff would come back before your Council with a subsequent recommendation. Committee Recommendation: 2) COORDINATE ALL DATA IN YEARLY FORMAT. Staff Analysis: Staff agrees. Zone 7, Hacienda Business Park and the City Water Department could easily forward results of water quality monitoring for use as a resource at City Hall. Periodically water quality information is required as a resource; coordinating all the separate data being generated by numerous jurisdictions would be invaluable to the City. There would be nominal fiscal impact to the City as a result of this recommendation. D) NOISE QUALITY Committee Recommendation: 1) EVALUATE NOISE ELEMENT SPRING 1986. Staff Analysis: Staff agrees. If the EMC is reappointed, it should work with staff in designing noise monitoring program. Ad hoc monitoring has taken place in conjunction with various north Pleasanton EIR's. A regular program would continue to ensure that noise levels continue to be met along the City's major streets. If staff, in conjunction with the EMC, determine that additional noise monitoring is required, then staff would report back to your Council. There would be no fiscal impacts to the City as a result of this recommendation at this time. Some costs may occur at a later date, depending on the ultimate program the City may choose to adopt to monitor noise. E) TRAFFIC QUALITY Committee Recommendation: 1) MONITOR 17 INTERSECTIONS BY JULY 1, 1986. Staff Analysis: Staff agrees and is working to "debug" the 10 intersections now on-line. Further staff investigation has revealed that all of the necessary funds are available to bring the Page ~ SR85:553