My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 04/29/96
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC 04/29/96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 4:00:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2008 2:17:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/29/1996
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 04/29/96
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Beougher thinks that the Commission could recommend such a change in calculation <br />• method. <br />couunissioner Barker asked staff what the Medium Density Residential ranges of other cities <br />are. Mr. Rasmussen advised that Medium Density Residemial ranges vary but generally are five <br />to twelve or fifteen units per acre; High Density Residential cuts in at 15-18 units. Staff advised <br />that the R-1-6,500 caning equals five units per acre. <br />The Commission, with the exception of Commissioner Barker, agreed with the staff <br />recommendation. Commissioner Barker wants to change the density definitions. <br />Commissioner Hovingh recommended a twofold action -that the affordable housing fee be <br />based on square footage of the lots and square footage of the house. Mr. Beougher advised that <br />the City would have to do a study. The Commission is recommending that this concept be <br />studied. Commissioner McGuirk would like more details on this issue before agreeing. <br />Mr. Rasmussen said that a program could be written to state that the fee could be written in such <br />a way. It would provide a process to look at it. <br />Chanter by C aster Review <br />The Commission approved of the proposed Errata listing, Attachment 3 of the May 6, 1996 Staff <br />• Report. <br />Chester I Introduction <br />Page I-5: Regarding racial and ethnic diversity, Commissioner Wright does not feel that ethnic <br />diversity needs to be included in the General Plan. <br />Commissioner Hovingh disagreed and suggested a broadening of the concept, suggesting it be <br />reworded as follows: "Pleasanton welcomes cultural, ethnic, economic, and racial diversity. <br />Commissioner McGuirk concurred. Commissioner Bazker and Chairman Lutz approve of both <br />the wording of the General Plan regarding racial and cultural diversity as well as the suggested <br />change. Consensus was to change the last sentence to Commissioner Hovingh's suggestion. <br />Chanter II Land Use Element <br />Page II-2, third full paragraph: Commissioner Hovingh would like to change "the remainder" <br />to a petrzntage figure (50 percent). Commissioner Wright and Chairman Lutz agreed. <br />Page II-9: Commissioner Hovingh noted that the density for Happy Valley was Previously <br />changed to offi unit per two-acre density <br />• Page ~ May 6. 1996 <br />Planning Comatisaioa Minims <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.