My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 04/29/96
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC 04/29/96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 4:00:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2008 2:17:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/29/1996
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 04/29/96
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />Commissioner Wright commented that discouraging any type of busllleSS IS not Correct 9tld f221S <br />that the General Plan should not specifically discourage drive-through businesses. 'these <br />businesses should be reviewed individually as the application comes through the City. <br />Commissioner Hovingh inquired if the Commission could impose criteria requiring that every <br />drive-through business have three windows for ordering, paymem, and pickup. <br />Mr. Rasmussen stated that the EIR air quality consultant reviewed this topic. His response is <br />that as time goes by and more cars get better and better catalytic converters and older cars aze <br />phased out, it becomes mazginal whether drive-throughs are detrimental to air quality. We are <br />at the point now that it would be better to allow the drive-through lanes because they would <br />result in less pollution. The consultant suggested adding a new program that would develop <br />standards for the design and use of new drive-through businesses to minimize adverse impacts <br />on air quality. <br />The Commission unanimously concurred with this suggestion. <br />Specific Plan Reference to Streets <br />The Commission unanimously concurred with the staff recommendation noting that street <br />alignments on the General Plan Map are conceptual only and may change subject to the outcome <br />of the specific plan. <br />• Die artment of Housing and Coal_munity Development Comments Regarding the Draft Housine <br />Element Update <br />Mr. Rasmussen stated that the four points as outlined in the staff report is staff's opinion as to <br />what will satisfy the State with respect to the General Plan Housing Element. State officials <br />require an update of the 1990 Housing Element Supplement and of Tables IV-9 and IV-13 of <br />the Draft Housing Element, and recommend to leave the High Density Residential density range <br />at eight units per acre and above and delete Housing Element Program 9.5 (inclusionary zoning <br />ordinance). Mr. Rasmussen commented that they took a strong stance against Program 9.5. <br />They were also generally opposed to the use of in-lieu affordable housing fees, but would let that <br />program stand. The State feels this will increase the overall cost of housing. <br />Staff advised the Commission to remove Program 9.5 since it will not change the way the City <br />works with developers to negotiate affordable housing units. <br />Commissioner Wright agrees with the staff recommendation to satisfy the State's requirements. <br />Commissioner Hoviogh suggested that the Affordable Housing Fce be based on both parcel <br />square footage and housing square footage, thereby having large lots/large homes pay more than <br />typical R 1-65001ots. Commissioner Hovingh feels that the 2A,000-square foot lot reduces the <br />opportunity for affordable housing in the future, and the 6,000-square foot house will require <br />more service persons than a typical 1,600-square foot house. <br />• Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 May 6, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.