My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 04/29/96
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC 04/29/96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 4:00:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2008 2:17:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/29/1996
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 04/29/96
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />u <br />Page II-10, third paragraph: Commissioner Hovingh noted apreviously-approved Change to the <br />Medium Density Residential density ranges. <br />Page II-il, third complete paragraph: Commissioner Hovingh noted that the hold capacity <br />calculations have changed. <br />Page II-16, Program 5.2: This was discussed and will remain as written. Chairman Lutz feels <br />that the City does seek business through the Economic Advisory Committee, and this program <br />should be viewed as guidance to staff. <br />Page II-16, Program 3.2: The Commission will accept the recommended language change from <br />the Park and Recreation Commission from "Consider" to "Explore," and the deletion of the <br />portion "or other public open space area to serve as a location for outdoor community events." <br />Page II-16, Program 3.4: This was discussed and approved as written. However, <br />Commissioner Hovingh feels that the limited pazking downtown could pose a problem. <br />Commissioner Wright feels that the City would not want to encourage three-story development <br />in the Downtown. <br />Page II-16, Program 3.5: Commissioner Hovingh suggested that the program (historic train <br />concept) be deleted from the General Plan until the project is better defined environmentally and <br />public response is received. Commissioner Wright suggested to use the language "Consider." <br />Commissioner McGuirk would prefer that the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way be used <br />for the best alternative for pedestrian/vehiculaz circulation. The final consensus was to change <br />"Encourage" to "Consider." <br />Page II-16, Program 6.2: There was discussion to add "affordable" regarding child caze <br />facilities. No agreement was reached to implement a change. <br />Page II-17, Program 7.2, and Page II-17, Program 6.4: Commissioner Wright feels that <br />residential housing duecdy next to BART is unacceptable. The Commission members agreed <br />to recommend the deletion of Programs 6.4 and 7.2. <br />Page I-18, Policy 9: Commissioner Wright felt that the word "Provide" should be changed to <br />,~ <br />"Make an effort" or "Where feasible. After discussion, the Commission agreed to the wording: <br />"Provide each major residential area with high quality r~ighborhood facilities including a pazk <br />and other amenities, and encourage the location of an elementary school." <br />Page II-19, Program 13.1: Commissioner Wright suggested a modification to read: "Make an <br />effort to reduce the need for vehicular traffic by...." This modification was accepted by the full <br />Commission. <br />Page II-19, Program 13-6: This program cegarding transit was discussed but was not changed. <br />• page a May 6, 1996 <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.