My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102407
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 102407
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:32:50 PM
Creation date
10/7/2008 11:06:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/24/2007
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10242007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC-2007-42 approving Case PCUP-201 was entered and adopted as <br />motioned. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />S.a. PCUP-196, Raehelle Neuyen <br />Application for a conditional use permit to operate an indoor recreation facility <br />for up to 40 children at the property located at 7071-7073 Commerce Circle. <br />Zoning for the property is I-G-40,000 (General Industrial) District. <br />Ms. Soo presented the staff report and summarized the background, scope and layout of <br />the proposed project. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding whether Mr. Zampierin's <br />letter was the only one received, Ms. Soo replied that an email from the lawyer of a <br />neighboring business had been received and forwarded to the Planning Commission. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Narum regarding the location of most of the <br />parking, Ms. Soo replied that it was located in the back of the building. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Narum regarding whether the entrance would <br />be located in the back of the building or whether the patrons would have to walk their <br />small children around a narrow driveway to the front of the building, Ms. Soo replied that <br />_ the there was an entrance in the back as well. She added that the applicant intended to <br />put a designated walkway around the building. <br />Chairperson Fox noted that Attachment 1 stated that some parents may choose to drop off <br />their children and expressed concern about that possibility. She requested a more <br />detailed definition of "drop off' as it related to this proposed use. Ms. Soo understood <br />that the applicant expected a 50/50 arrangement of drop-off s and walk-in's. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Rachelle Nguyen, applicant, noted that she and her husband proposed to operate <br />BounceU by reservation only. She added that BounceU was a franchise, with over <br />40 businesses operating and that it had strict regulations requiring that the businesses <br />operate in a professional and safe manner. She noted that parents were seeking <br />inexpensive and safe alternatives for children's parties and added that their business met <br />that need. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding the layout of the business <br />with respect to its use, Ms. Nguyen displayed the site plan and described the proposed <br />operation. <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that bounce facilities generally had very tight controls for <br />entry and exit for the children and inquired how the applicant intended to implement <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 24, 2007 Page 10 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.