PC 11/10/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

d. PUD-98-06, Braddock & Loan Application for: (1) PUD rezoning of a one-acre parcel located at 1635 Rose Avenue from the A (Agriculture) zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) -MDR (Medium Density Residential) zoning district; and (2) PUD development plan approval for 341ots, ranging in size from 7,600 square feet to 13,400 square feet, on 13.3 acres located at 1635, 1777, and 1851 Rose Avenue, generally at the westerly terminus of Rose Avenue. Zoning for the property is A (Agriculture) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) MDR (Medium Density Residential) District. The Planning Commission will also consider the Negative Declaration prepared for the project. Continued To November 23,1998. e. RZ-98-08, Citv of Pleasanton City initiated rezoning from the R-1-6,500 zoning district (Single Family Residential, 6,500 square foot minimum lot size) to the PUD-MDR (Planned Unit Development -Medium Density Residential) District for property located at 1500, 1027, and 1015 Rose Avenue. The 15.3 + acre site is comprised of two parcels commonly referred to as Nolan Farms and is generally situated north of Rose Avenue between Rose Lane and Division Street. Mr. Iserson referenced the staff report dated November 10, 1998 and highlighted key azeas contained in the report including background information, project description, the reasons that staff is proposing a PUD zoning for the site, and results of the Pazk and Recreation Commission meeting of October 8, 1998. In conclusion, Mr. Iserson stated that staffs recommendation is that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of Case RZ-98-08. Discussion ensued relating to density levels, an advisory condition being applied to keep density at the General Plan midpoint, and potential amenities which could be provided by the developer in exchange for higher density. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Beatrice Nolan, 1027 Rose Avenue, expressed concern with the proposed plan of rezoning and felt that no one from the City consulted with her on this rezoning. Further, she stated that it is her intent to still reside on the property. Peter ICrulevitch, 1122 Division Street, stated his concerns are outlined inane-mail that is attached to the staff report. He expressed concern with allowing a high density of homes to be built on the property and with rural views being obstructed. Sarah Munroe, 1077 Division Street, expressed concern with a high density of homes being built on property due to impacts on aesthetics, traffic, property values, and parking. John Steinbush of Colliers initiated discussion relating to differences in R-1-6,500 zoning and PUD-MDR zoning. Further, he expressed concem with using the PUD to obtain a pazk which might reduce density on the property. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 8 November 10, 1998