Laserfiche WebLink
The Commission addressed Recommendation No. 7, "whether Mr. Merritt should be required to <br />terminate his manufacturing operation upon annexation to the City, as recommended by staff, or allowed <br />to continue subject to adherence to Code requirements as outlined in Exhibit "C". Commissioner <br />Cooper stated that if Mr. Merritt were to relocate his place of operation, brought the building up to <br />compliance, and a sunset clause was developed limiting operation to a 2-3 year period of time with <br />business being non-transferable at that time and operation of business would cease, he would be in <br />support of the continued business; otherwise, he would support terminating the operation of the <br />business. Commissioner Maas stated she would support Commissioner Cooper's suggestion. <br />Chairperson Kumazan expressed his concern with the findings of staff and stated he would support <br />staffs recommendation to terminate the business. Commissioner Roberts stated she would support <br />staffs recommendation to terminate the business. Commissioner Sullivan stated this residential azea is <br />not appropriate for this business and stated he would support staff s recommendation. The consensus of <br />the Commission was to terminate the business upon annexation. <br />The Commission concurred that they are in favor of a masonry wall for the parameter of development <br />and north and south boundaries. <br />Commissioner Roberts addressed the amenity issue and stated she would support the funds being used <br />for the Alviso Adobe project and mitigating traffic impacts, encouraging pedestrian, bicycle and public <br />transit including a bus turn-out for future bus use. <br />Commissioner Cooper stated he would support the amenity funds being used to complete the bicycle <br />lane on Foothill Boulevard and the Alviso Adobe project. <br />Commissioner Sullivan expressed his inability to decide what the density bonus should be due to lack of <br />information received. <br />Chairperson Kumazan suggested that each Commissioner develop a list containing what the amenity <br />money should be used for and the amount of the amenity. Commissioner Roberts stated that the bus <br />stop should be developed as a condition of the application and the Commission concurred. <br />Commissioner Maas stated she would desire to see the amenity returned to the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission for their input on expenditure of funds and spoke in favor of the amenity being $1 million. <br />Further, she spoke in support of funds being utilized in the Foothill area. <br />Chairperson Kumazan was opposed to giving a density bonus. <br />Commissioner Roberts expressed her support of a $1 million amenity ,but expressed her desire to see <br />the money utilized in the Foothill azea. Further, she stated she would like the money to be used for <br />traffic mitigation such as a bicycle lane and secondly for the Alviso Adobe project. <br />Commissioner Sullivan stated he would like additional information and input on the amenity issue such <br />as a workshop, and he spoke in favor of receiving public input on the amenity issue and the funds being <br />utilized in transit areas. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 10 September 23, 1998 <br />