Laserfiche WebLink
Further, she noted there should be discussion for uses of the $800,000 amenity funds and stated that <br />improvements and enhancements to Alviso Adobe Pazk could be a visual, cultural and educational asset. <br />She requested that issues relating to overcrowding in schools be addressed by the DeSilva group. She <br />expressed ambiguity with the density of project; however, she noted support in retaining rural elements <br />on Foothill Drive. She expressed concern with removal of trees, and especially the three lazge oak trees <br />in development. She expressed ambiguity for a traffic light on Foothill Drive; however, she stated that <br />light might possibly slow down Foothill High traffic. She concluded by commending the developer for <br />working cooperatively with the neighbors and suggested that the applicant develop an additional <br />one-story plan. <br />Commissioner Sullivan commended the developer for his cooperative work with the neighbors. Further, <br />he spoke in favor of less density for development with the tazget range being between 46, as referenced <br />in the General Plan, and 91. Further, he supported remaining space being used for open-space buffers <br />with trees between the north and south side to retain some of the lost atmosphere of neighborhood. He <br />supported increasing the buffer along the freeway to 200 feet, with large trees to buffer noise. Further, <br />he expressed concern with the noisiness of parks adjacent to freeways, and stated he would like to see <br />the dry creek bed along south end of development restored with trees. <br />Commissioner Sullivan supported aone-street connection at Foothill with no vehicle connections into <br />north or south neighborhoods, EVA connections on north and south sides, and bicycle and pedestrian <br />access on EVA connections. <br />Commissioner Sullvian noted support for all one-story homes on north and south borders, different <br />one-story plans being developed to add vaziety to development ,and lowering roof lines on single-story <br />homes to maintain views. Further, he spoke in support of staffs recommendation for detailing on side <br />and rear of houses, and stated in his view, the houses being developed do not blend in with adjacent <br />neighborhoods. In addition, Commissioner Sullivan expressed support of replanting of trees along <br />Foothill Road, and stated his desire for replanting of mature trees. <br />Commissioner Sullivan indicated ambiguity with a traffic light being installed along Foothill Boulevard, <br />due to the planning of three additional stop lights along areas of Foothill Boulevard. He expressed <br />concurrence with the neighbor's view that there will be cut-through traffic resulting from a traffic light, <br />even with stated restrictions. He expressed disagreement with the EIR and Negative Declaration and <br />expressed concurrence with neighbor's comments that there will be an impact on plant and animal <br />species due to the ecosystem existing in the walnut orchard. In addition, he noted that housing tracts <br />should not be developed adjacent to freeways. <br />Commissioner Sullivan stated he would support the open space idea of the developer and noted interest <br />in the amenity funding for Alviso Adobe Park. Further, he suggested using amenity funds for schools, <br />reestablishing school bussing, the Altamont Train system, or contribution to local public transits to <br />relieve traffic congestion. In conclusion, Commissioner Sullivan spoke in support of restrictions on out <br />building adjacent to existing neighborhoods, neighbors remaining at existing grade, allowing continued <br />- light industrial use of the Merritt property, and reducing impacts on schools by not approving more <br />housing development until school issues are resolved. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 22, 1998 Page 8 <br />