My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/08/1998
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
PC 07/08/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:01:43 PM
Creation date
10/7/2008 9:37:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/8/1998
DOCUMENT NAME
07/08/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Iserson stated that the 29-space pazking lot would be located at 4287 Stanley Boulevard for <br />restricted employee use, with akey-card entry system. Staff has examined issues relating to vehicles <br />stacking in the driveway while waiting to enter the lot and has deemed stacking to be sufficient. In <br />addition, he stated that pazking is aligned perpendicularly in fashion and due to the dead-end pazking lot, <br />the applicant did include aturn-azound azea. Staff concludes that if pazking spaces aze numbered for <br />employees, there is no need for a second plan of exiting the pazking lot. <br />Further, he stated that staff has recommended a requirement that lighting adjacent to neighbors be <br />shielded and lights be turned off at 9:00 p.m. Mr. Iserson continued by stating that a tree report was <br />prepazed and the applicant is proposing removal of three heritage trees which aze in poor condition. <br />Further, that the applicant proposed removal of fewer trees than the tree report suggested. Staff feels <br />that applicant has done a good job relating to tree preservation and planting of new trees on site. <br />Mr. Iserson stated, with respect to the Bank addition, there was approval for the 13,000 squaze foot bank <br />and a 3,000 squaze foot addition is proposed at reaz of building, with no design consequence on the <br />building as viewed from the street. Staff concurs that the building design is consistent as previously <br />approved for the project. In addition, the Automated Teller Machine (ATM) will be relocated to the rear <br />of the building. <br />Mr. Iserson continued by stating that the site is somewhat constrained, has three straight frontages, is <br />fairly narrow in terms of depth, and stated that the applicant has located building in as close proximity to <br />the front property line as possible to meet the downtown style of building design and location. Further, <br />that if the additional pazking lot is approved across the street, only customers would be utilizing the rear <br />pazking lot. <br />Mr. Iserson noted that staff has recommended that the City Council initiate a Code amendment for bank <br />parking requirements due to staff's belief that the current Municipal Code requirement for bank pazking, <br />at a ratio of one space for 150 squaze feet, is outdated and excessive given technology's effect on the <br />banking business. Further, that if the bank were assessed a pazking ratio of 1/300, such as in office and <br />commercial use, there would be sufficient parking with on-and off-site pazking azeas. <br />Mr. Iserson continued by stating that until the City Council takes action on the code amendment that <br />staff proposes, there will be a shortage often parking lot spaces. Mr. Iserson stated that the applicant <br />would like to address the deficiency in pazking issues. <br />In addition, Mr. Iserson noted that staff proposes that approval of this expansion shall not take effect <br />until the approval for the conditional use permit and the design review for the pazking lot at 4287 <br />Stanley Boulevadd becomes effective, as referenced in the July 7, 1998 memorandum from Kathryn <br />Watt, Associate Planner. <br />Mr. Iserson noted that the azchitecture for the addition is appropriate and consistent with the Downtown <br />Design Guidelines for the addition and there is very little change in the landscaping plan; however, Mr. <br />Iserson pointed out that the landscape strip along the rear of the site is nazrow and there is no <br />opportunity to plant trees in that area. <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 July 8, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.