PC 06/24/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-98-45 was entered and adopted finding that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment and recommending approval of the draft Negative Declaration for Case PUD-98-04 and finding that the project has a De Minimis impact on the site's wildlife. A motion was made by Commissioner Kumaran, seconded by Commissioner Maas, do recommend that the proposed PUD development plan is consistent with the General Plan and purposes of the PUD ordinance. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Kumaran, Maas, Roberts, and Chair Cooper NOES: Commissioner Sullivan ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Commissioner Sullivan noted for the record that he voted "no" because he did not believe,the General Plan encourages what is essentially a residential facility to be built with border-line noise levels. A motion was made by Commissioner Maas, seconded by Commissioner Roberts, to'recommend approval of Case PUD-98-04 subject to the conditions in Exhibit B with the followin~ modifications: - 1) Delete Condition No. 8 which refers to the installation of a deceleration lame; 2) Widen the Santa Rita Road driveway to provide easier turning access; 3) Include stronger language giving priority to Pleasanton residents and then immediate family to avail of the affordable units; and 4) Include stronger language that the affordable housing program would remain in perpetuity and that the City would be able to recoup its funds should the program be terminated. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Kumaran, Maas, Roberts, and Chair Cooper NOES: Commissioner Sullivan ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Commissioner Sullivan noted for the record that he voted no for the same reason. Resolution No. PC-98-46 was entered and adopted recommending that the proposed PUD development plan is consistent with the General Plan and purposes of the PUD ordinance, and recommending approval of Case PUD-98-04 as motioned. Planning Commission Minutes Page 14 June 24, 1998